loading page

Signal monitoring for adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines during the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic: an evaluation of the South African surveillance system
  • +3
  • Chenoa Sankar,
  • Stephen Evans,
  • Hannelie Meyer,
  • Gunter HM,
  • Victoria Sekiti,
  • Kerrigan McCarthy
Chenoa Sankar
National Institute for Communicable Diseases

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Stephen Evans
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health
Author Profile
Hannelie Meyer
Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University School of Health Care Sciences
Author Profile
Gunter HM
University of Cape Town
Author Profile
Victoria Sekiti
South African Health Products Regulatory Authority
Author Profile
Kerrigan McCarthy
National Institute for Communicable Diseases
Author Profile

Abstract

Purpose: Monitoring of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is recommended for post-licensure surveillance. We investigated whether the South African surveillance system could detect signals of disproportionate reporting and whether these signals aligned with globally identified AEFI and adverse events of special interest (AESI) post-COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: This retrospective pharmacovigilance study undertook disproportionality analysis of the National Department of Health AEFI database from the start of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout on 17/05/2021 to 31/12/2022. We complemented this with AEFI reports for vaccines not on the routine Expanded Programme on Immunisation schedule, to address potential masking of signals due to the high reporting rate of COVID-19 vaccine AEFI. Results: During the study period, 3846 AEFI were reported for 37,537,009 doses of COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S) administered. The overall reporting rate was 10.2 per 100,000 doses, 18.1/100,000 and 7.9/100,000 for BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively. Comparison with other countries suggests underreporting. Disproportionate reporting signals were obtained for three and seven AEFI following BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines, respectively. An additional AEFI signal from Ad26.COV2.S emerged in the augmented dataset, indicating masking. All Ad26.COV2.S signals, and one BNT162b2 signal, appear in the vaccines’ product information. Among nine AESI evaluated, myocarditis/pericarditis presented as a signal of disproportionate reporting following BNT162b2 vaccination. Conclusion: This study is one of the first from a lower middle income country, using a spontaneous reporting system for signal detection post-COVID-19 vaccination. Signals aligned with those reported globally. The study highlights needs to further investigate underreporting, masking, and system attributes for system strengthening.