Laughter as a subject and a tool for interdisciplinary investigations in
Philosophy and Neuroscience
- Vivian Sugano,
- Marilia Rizzo,
- Claudinei Biazoli
Abstract
Laughter has been studied by both philosophers and neuroscientists, yet
the possible bridges between these two fronts of investigation is little
explored. Bergson theorized about laughter and argued about its central
social role. Human laughter, for Bergson, needs a social echo and brings
malleability to social rigidity. We laugh at what is mechanical where
there should be flexibility, for instance. Critchley, a contemporary
philosopher, agrees with Bergson and adds that humor can also change our
views on social structures and situations. Based on these philosophical
theories on humor and recent methodological advances in functional
connectivity dynamics in neuroimaging, we advance an hypothesis about
the relations between laughter, cognitive flexibility and brain
metastability. Laughter can be interpreted as a social behavior that
reframes the interaction context and modulates individuals brain
dynamics instantiating cognitive flexibility. Finally, in a parallel to
interdisciplinary investigation of curiosity, we argue that laughter is
not only a subject but a tool for advancing joint endeavors in
neuroscience and philosophy.16 Sep 2024Submitted to European Journal of Neuroscience 21 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
21 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
21 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
23 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned