Introduction Some patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-response to PeAF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures. Methods This study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A (0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure. Results During a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the AF-free survival rate significantly differed by LVA size. Conclusion Extensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with a poor clinical outcome even following multiple procedures.

Introduction: A novel ablation catheter that can measure local impedance (LI) was recently launched. We aimed to explore target LI measurements at each radiofrequency application (RFA) for creating sufficient ablation lesions during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Methods: This prospective study included 15 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo an initial ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Circumferential ablation around both ipsilateral PVs was performed using a 4-mm irrigated ablation catheter with an LI sensor. Point-by-point ablation was used with a 4-mm inter-ablation-point distance. Operators were blinded to LI measurements during the procedure. Creation of sufficient ablation lesions was assessed by the absence of a conduction gap. Results: After first-pass encircling PV antrum ablation, left atrium to PV conduction remained in 12 of 30 (40%) ipsilateral PVs. Mapping using the mini-basket catheter identified 48 ablation points through which the propagation wave entered the PV. At ablation points with a gap, the LI drop during RFA was half that at points without a gap (12 ± 7 vs. 23 ± 12 ohm, p<0.001). The GI drop did not differ between ablation points with and without a gap (12 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 10 ohm, p=0.10). An LI drop of 15 ohm predicted sufficient lesion formation without a gap with a sensitivity of 0.71, specificity of 0.81, and predictive accuracy of 0.75. Conclusion: A target LI drop of 15 ohm at each RFA with a 4-mm distance between adjacent ablation points may facilitate creation of sufficient ablation lesions during PV isolation