References
1. Berte B, Hilfiker G, Russi I, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a
higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow
ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019;
30(11):2199-2204.
2. Pambrun T, Durand C, Constantin M, et al. High-Power (40–50 W)
Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by Unipolar Signal Modification for
Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2019; 12 (6): p. e007304.
3. Kottmaier M, Poppa M, Bourier F, et al. Safety and outcome of very
high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein
isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Europace 2020;22(3):388-393.
4. Ejima K, Henmi R, Iwanami Y, et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of
Empiric Thoracic Vein Isolation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Without Structural Heart
Disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2017;28(3): p.
266-272.
5. Koichiro Ejima SH, Kyoichiro Yazaki, Shohei Kataoka, et al.
Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy
deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal
modification as a local endpoint. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2020. In press .
6. Bortone A, Brault-Noble G, Appetiti A, Marijon E Elimination of the
negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram as an in vivo
marker of transmural lesion creation: acute study in canines.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015; 8(4): p. 905-911.
7. Bortone A, Appetiti A, Bouzeman A, et al. Unipolar signal
modification as a guide for lesion creation during radiofrequency
application in the left atrium: prospective study in humans in the
setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013. 6 (6): p. 1095-1102.
8. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, Patrawala RA. Atrial fibrillation
ablation: ”perpetual motion” of open irrigated tip catheters at 50 W is
safe and improves outcomes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2011; 34 (5): p. 531-539.
9. Winkle RA, Moskovitz R, Mead RH, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation
using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing
catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 52(1): p.
1-8.
10. Dhillon G, Ahsan S, Honarbakhsh S, et al. A multicentered evaluation
of ablation at higher power guided by ablation index: Establishing
ablation targets for pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc
Electrophysiol 2019; 30(3):357-365.
11. Chen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, et al. Ablation index-guided 50 W
ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial
fibrillation: Procedural data, lesion analysis, and initial results from
the FAFA AI High Power Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2019. 30(12): p. 2724-2731.
12. Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Five seconds of 50-60 W
radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro
mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation.Europace 2017;19(5): p. 874-880.
13. Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, et al. High-power short-duration
versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion
metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2018; 29(11): p.
1570-1575.
14. Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, et al. Low complication rates
using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation
ablations. Heart Rhythm 2019;16(2): p. 165-169.
15. Baher A, Kheirkhahan M, Rechenmacher SJ, et al. High-Power
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late
Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a
Novel Index of Esophageal Injury. JACC: Clin
Electrophysiol 2018;4(12): p. 1583-1594.
16. Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Long-term outcomes after low
power, slower movement versus high power, faster movement irrigated-tip
catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm2020; 17(2):184-189
17. Castrejón-Castrejón S, Martínez Cossiani M, Ortega Molina M, et al.
Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power
short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the
POWER-FAST PILOT study. J Interv Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2020; 57(1):57-65.
18. Chinitz JS, Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, et al. Sites With Small Impedance
Decrease During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Are Associated
With Recovery of Pulmonary Vein Conduction. J Cardiovasc
Electrophysiol 2016; 27(12): p. 1390-1398.
19. Inaba O, Nagata Y, Sekigawa Masahiro, et al. Impact of impedance
decrease during radiofrequency current application for atrial
fibrillation ablation on myocardial lesion and gap formation.J Arrhythm 2018; 34(3): p. 247-253.
20. Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, et al. Relationship between catheter
contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop
in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and
electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact
force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7 (6): p. 1174-80.
21. Reichlin T, Knecht S, Lane C, et al. Initial impedance decrease as
an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency
ablation with force sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm 2014;
11(2): p. 194-201.
22. Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, et al. Contact force and impedance
decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation:
insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing
catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2015; 43(3): p.
297-306.
23. Anter E, Tschabrunn CM, Contreras-Valdes FM, Buxton AE, Josephson
ME. Radiofrequency ablation annotation algorithm reduces the incidence
of linear gaps and reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation.Heart Rhythm 2014; 11(5): p. 783-790.