5. REFERENCES
- Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, Taggart DP, Yan TD. A meta-analysis
comparing bilateral mammary artery with left internal mammary artery
for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg
2013;2(4):390-400.
- Benedetto U, Amrani M, Gaer J, Bahrami T, de Robertis F, Simon AR et
al. The influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries on short- and
long-term outcomes: A propensity score matching in accordance with
current recommendations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;
148(6):2699-705
- Takagi H, Goto SN, Watanabe T, Mizuno Y, Kawai N, Umemoto T. A
meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies
of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery
bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148(4):1282-90.
- Sa MP, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, Vasconcelos FP, Ferraz AA, Braile DM, et
al. Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of
sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis
and meta- regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac
Surg. 2013;16(6):849-57.
- Kurlansky PA. Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Ebra G. Bilateral versus
single internal mammary artery grafting in the elderly: long-term
survival benefit. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100(4):1374-81.
- Kajimoto K, Yamamoto T, Amano A. Coronary artery bypass
revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic arteries in
diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac
Surg, 2015;99(3):1097-104.
- Kinoshita T, Asai T, Suzuki T, Kuroyanagi S, Hosoba S, Takashima N et
al. Off-pump bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting
in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:531-6.
- Grau JB, Ferrari G, Mak AWC, Shaw RE, Brizzio ME, Mindich BP et al.
Propensity matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery
versus single left internal mammary artery grafting at 17-year
follow-up: validation of a contemporary surgical experience. E J
Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41(4):770-776.
- Kurlanksy PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Zucker M , Ebra G.
Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal
mammary artery in propensity-matched groups. Ann Thorac Surg
2010;90:101-8.
- Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove
DM. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on
survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg
2004;78:2005-14.
- Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM et al. Effects
of on-pump and off-pump surgery in the Arterial Revascularization
Trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;47(6):1059-65.
- Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM. Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM et al.
Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. internal mammary coronary
artery bypass grafting: 1-year results for the Arterial
Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2470-81.
- Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM. Lees B, Gerry S, Benedetto U et al.
Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic artery
grafts. N Engl J Med, 2016;375:2540-2549.
- Taggart DP. Benedetto U, Gerry S, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees Bet al.
Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic artery grafts at 10 years. M
Engl J Med 2019; 380:43-446.
- Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S, Gray A, Lees B, Flather M et al.
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Insight from
the Arterial Revascularisation Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2018;155:1545-53).
- Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S, Gray A, Lees B, Pawlaczyk P et al.
Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic
artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications:
Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial. J Thorac Cardiovas
Surg 2016; 152:270-6.
- Raja SG. Surgical strategies for bilateral internal mammary artery
grafting. Int J Surg 2015(16);140-145.
- Robinson BM, Paterson HS, Naidoo R, Dhurandhar V, Denniss AR.
Bilateral internal thoracic artery composite Y grafts: analysis of 464
angiograms in 296 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:974-80.
- Umakanthan J, Jeyakumar P, Umakanthan B, Jeyakumar N, Senthilkumar N,
Saraswathy MR et al. Barriers to the universal adoption of bilateral
internal mammary artery grafting. Int J Surg 2015:16;179-182
- LaPar DJ, Crosby IK, Rich JB, Quader MA, Speir AM, Kern JA et al.
Bilateral internal mammary artery use for coronary artery bypass
grafting remains underutilized: a propensity-matched multi-institution
analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:8-15.
- Benedetto U, Gaudino M, Caputo M, Tranbaugh RF, Lau C, Di Franco A et
al. Right internal thoracic artery versus radial artery as the second
best arterial conduit: Insights from a meta-analysis of
propensity-matched data on long-term survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg, 2016; 152:1083-91.
- Pevni D, Mohr R, Paz Y, Kramer A, Ben-Gal Y, Nesher N et al. Long-term
outcome of revascularization with composite T-grafts: Is bilateral
mammary grafting better than single mammary and radial artery
grafting? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:1311-1319.
- Benedetto U, Caputo M, Zakkar M, Bryan A, Angelini GA. Are three
arteries better than two? Impact of using the radial artery in
addition to bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on long-term
survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016
- Mohammadi S, Dagenais F, Voisine P, Dumont E, Charbonneau E, Marzouk M
et al. Impact of the radial artery as and additional arterial conduit
during in-situ bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: a
propensity score-matched study. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:913-8.
- Lamy A, Deverauz PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E et
al. Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at
1 year. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1179-1188.
- Shroyer Al, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E et
al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J
med 2009; 361:1824-1837.