Funding
Funding was not gained or sought for this study.
References
1. Cochrane. About us https://wwwcochraneorg/about-us. Accessed 1
July 2020.
2. Cochrane. Welcome Gynaecology and Fertility Group.
https://cgfcochraneorg/welcome Accessed 1 July 2020.
3. Farquhar CM, Showell MG, Showell EAE, Beetham P, Baak N, Mourad S, et
al. Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of
bias. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2017;84:47-53.
4. Farquhar CM, Showell MG, Showell EAE, Beetham P, Baak N, Mourad S, et
al. Clinical trial registration in fertility trials - a case for
improvement? Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1827-34.
5. Wilkinson J, Roberts SA, Showell M, Brison DR, Vail A. No common
denominator: a review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs. Hum Reprod.
2016;31(12):2714-22.
6. Cochrane Library. How Central is created 2020 [cited 2020 2
December]. Available from:
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/central-creation
7. Alloo J, Vallath S, Del Mar C, Carter M, Thorning S, Clark J.
Determining the gaps between Cochrane reviews and trials of
effectiveness of interventions for acute respiratory infections: an
audit. Systematic reviews. 2017;6(1):82.
8. Alliance JL. The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships
South Hampton: National Institue for HealthResearch Evaluation Trials
and Coordinating Centre; 2018 [Accessed in August 2018]. Available
from: https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/
9. Graham L, Illingworth BJG, Showell M, Vercoe M, Farquhar CM, Crosbie
EJ, et al. Research priority setting in women’s health: a systematic
review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
2020;127(6):694-700.
10. Horne AW, Abokhrais IM, Hogg L, Saunders PTK. Top ten endometriosis
research priorities in the UK and Ireland. The Lancet.
2017;389(10085):2191-2.
11. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis
JP, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.
Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101-4.
12. Jenkins VA, Fallowfield LJ. For the Benefit of Others: Reasons Why
Women with Breast Cancer Participate in RCTs. Breast care (Basel,
Switzerland). 2015;10(2):88-93.
13. Minogue V, Cooke M, Donskoy AL, Vicary P, Wells B. Patient and
public involvement in reducing health and care research waste. Research
involvement and engagement. 2018;4:5.
14. Oliver DP, Benson JJ, Ulrich C, Washington KT, Rolbiecki AJ, White
P, et al. Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers
of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study. Journal of
pain and symptom management. 2020.
15. Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher
D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design,
conduct, and analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2014;383(9912):166-75.
16. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1
(updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from
wwwtrainingcochraneorg/handbook [Internet]. 2020.
17. Showell M, Stedman K, Farquhar C, Jordan-Cole V. Using the Cochrane
Register of Studies to identify the evidence gaps in Fertility Cochrane
systematic reviews. Virtual conference. University of Auckland2020.
18. Liu L, Tang Y, Baxter GD, Yin H, Tumilty S. Complementary and
alternative medicine - practice, attitudes, and knowledge among
healthcare professionals in New Zealand: an integrative review. BMC
complementary medicine and therapies. 2021;21(1):63.