COVID-19: Comparison of Epidemiological Measures-State of Emergency vs
Social Distance
Abstract
Background: By interrupting all human-to-human transmission, SARS and
MERS were effectively eradicated few years ago, but, due to the numerous
asymptomatic cases of COVID-19, spreading of disease is facilitated and
it will be difficult to overcome it in this way. Methodology: The aim of
our study was to compare the efficacy and consequences of proposed
epidemiological measures between countries. We analyzed the available
databases to compare states with strict whit those with relatively
liberal approach to COVID-19 prevention. Results: We showed a
statistically significant difference in the number of patients and
deaths caused by SARS-CoV-2 depending on the degree and timing of the
epidemiological measures introduced in studied countries. Conclusion:
Apart from the characteristics of the virus itself, the epidemiological
measures that have been introduced, as well as their timing, are
essential for preventing the spread of COVID 19 infection. In the
absence of an effective drug or vaccine traditional epidemiological
measures are the only weapon in the battle against COVID-19.