No VIFs were >5, thus all predictors were entered into the global model (see Table S1 for candidate model selection). Model averaging suggested that GFWO nests were less likely to be successful as decay increased (β = -0.91), and were more likely to be successful as vegetation cover increased (β = 0.10) (Table 2). Looking at the magnitude of effect, decay was nearly ten times stronger at predicting successful nests for GFWO than vegetation cover, though both were significant. Notably, with every unit increase in decay (ranked 1-7) nest success for the GFWO dropped 0.41.