References
- T. J. Phelan, A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics 45, 117-136 (1999).
- C. Barnes, The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. J. Acad. Libr. 43, 487-494 (2017).
- L. Wildgaard, "An overview of author-level indicators of research
performance" in Springer Handbook of Science and Technology
Indicators, W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, M. Thelwall, Eds.
(Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019),
10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_14, pp. 361-396.
- J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific
research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102,
16569-16572 (2005).
- A. Schubert, G. Schubert, "All along the h-index-related
literature: a guided tour" in Springer Handbook of Science and
Technology Indicators, W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, M.
Thelwall, Eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019),
10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_12, pp. 301-334.
- L. Egghe, How to improve the h -index. The Scientist 20, 15 (2006).
- C.-T. Zhang, The e-Index, complementing the h-Index for
excess citations. PLoS One 4, e5429 (2009).
- T. Fenner, M. Harris, M. Levene, J. Bar-Ilan, A novel bibliometric
index with a simple geometric interpretation. PLoS One 13, e0200098 (2018).
- M. Schreiber, A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. J. Informetr. 2, 211-216 (2008).
- M. Schreiber, How to modify the g-index for multi-authored
manuscripts. J. Informetr. 4, 42-54 (2010).
- D. F. Thompson, E. C. Callen, M. C. Nahata, New indices in
scholarship assessment. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 73, 111-111
(2009).
- L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, H.-D. Daniel, Are there better indices for
evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine
different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 59, 830-837 (2008).
- L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, S. E. Hug, H.-D. Daniel, A multilevel
meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and
37 different h index variants. J. Informetr. 5,
346-359 (2011).
- R. Costas, M. Bordons, The h-index: advantages, limitations and its
relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J.
Informetr. 1, 193-203 (2007).
- T. R. Anderson, R. K. S. Hankin, P. D. Killworth, Beyond the Durfee
square: enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics 76, 577-588 (2008).
- P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, Is it possible to
compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68, 179-189 (2006).
- C. D. Kelly, M. D. Jennions, The h index and career
assessment by numbers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 167-170
(2006).
- J. E. Hirsch, Does the h index have predictive power? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19193 (2007).
- L. Bornmann, Redundancies in h index variants and the
proposal of the number of top-cited papers as an attractive indicator. Measurement 10, 149-153 (2012).
- R. Costas, T. Franssen, Reflections around ‘the cautionary use’ of
the h-index: response to Teixeira da Silva and Dobránszki. Scientometrics 115, 1125-1130 (2018).
- G. Abramo, C. A. D’Angelo, F. Viel, The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions. Scientometrics 97, 555-570 (2013).
- Y. Bhattacharjee, Impact factor. Science 309, 1181
(2005).
- E. Delgado López-Cózar, E. Orduña-Malea, A. Martín-Martín, "Google
Scholar as a data source for research assessment" in Springer Handbook
of Science and Technology Indicators, W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U.
Schmoch, M. Thelwall, Eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham,
2019), 10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_4, pp. 95-127.
- T. Tregenza, Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends
Ecol. Evol. 17, 349-350 (2002).
- V. Larivière, C. Ni, Y. Gingras, B. Cronin, C. R. Sugimoto, Global
gender disparities in science. Nature 504, 211-213
(2013).
- L. Howe-Walsh, S. Turnbull, Barriers to women leaders in academia:
tales from science and technology. Stud. High. Educ. 41,
415-428 (2016).
- D. W. Aksnes, Characteristics of highly cited papers. Res.
Eval. 12, 159-170 (2003).
- D. Maliniak, R. Powers, B. F. Walter, The gender citation gap in
international relations. Intl. Organ. 67, 889-922
(2013).
- C. Beaudry, V. Larivière, Which gender gap? Factors affecting
researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Res.
Policy 45, 1790-1817 (2016).
- A. L. Atchison, Negating the gender citation advantage in political
science. PS-Polit. Sci. Polit. 50, 448-455 (2017).
- R. Todeschini, A. Baccini, Handbook of Bibliometric
Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2016).
- J. Austin, Interdisciplinarity and tenure. Science 10
January (2003).
- E. Evans, Paradigms, Interdisciplinarity, and Tenure. PhD
thesis (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA, 2016), ISBN:
978-0-4386-6106-6, pp. 83.
- T. E. Carter, T. E. Smith, P. J. Osteen, Gender comparisons of
social work faculty using H-Index scores. Scientometrics 111, 1547-1557 (2017).
- J. A. Teixeira da Silva, J. Dobránszki, Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes. Scientometrics 115, 1107-1113 (2018).
- J. A. Teixeira da Silva, J. Dobránszki, Rejoinder to “Multiple
versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes”. Scientometrics 115, 1131-1137 (2018).