The construction industry, which is one among the high-risk industries, is prone to safety accidents in the construction process because of the ambiguous safety concepts, poor self-protection awareness, and poor working environment [2]. Domestic and foreign researchers have conducted several studies on methods to avoid accidents, and have concluded that unsafe behavior of individuals, status of objects, environmental factors, and managemental inefficiency are the primary factors involved in safety accidents, and are often referred to as "4M" elements: the men, machines or matter, medium, and management. The interaction and combination of these factors in a certain period of time lead to the occurrence of safety accidents, which is the key factor in safety accident control. In the construction industry, Wang X F [3], and Jia X et al. [4] stated that effective organizational support from the management toward workers can significantly improve the safety behavior of workers. Zhai R et al. [5] proposed that enforcing safety standards related to people is the premise to ensure construction safety. Du T et al. [6] studied the construction safety evaluation of construction projects using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, established a project construction safety evaluation index system, and formulated the specific inspection items and scoring rules of the second-level index for safety evaluation. Wu T Y et al. [7] developed a method to evaluate construction safety management. In 1931, Heinrich, a well-known American safety engineer, completed industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach, a classic work in the history of safety research, and proposed Heinrich's Law in 1941. Through the statistical analysis of 550,000 mechanical accidents, it is believed that the irresponsible behavior of people and the unsafe state of things are the direct causes of accidents. It is proposed that the objective of the safety work is to prevent the irresponsible behavior of people, eliminate the unsafe state of machinery or materials, interrupt the chain of accidents, and avoid the occurrence of accidents [8]. In terms of theoretical research, Dağdeviren et al. [9] proposed a fuzzy AHP (FAHP) to determine the level of error-behavior risk in a working system based on the analysis of factors affecting the construction safety uncertainty. They utilized the data fuzzy processing and AHP to develop the behavior safety management evaluation model for a construction site. Patel et al. [10] used a structural equation model to empirically test the safety climate, hazard management (HM), security budget, safety rules and regulations, and employee safety behavior (WB) influence on the project safety performance (SP), and formulated the safety climate and hazard management to ensure the safety of employees and analyze their working patterns. The project SP had a desirable effect.