References
1. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing
the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for
Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1181-93.
2. Ananth CV, Brandt JS, Vintzileos AM. Standard vs population reference
curves in obstetrics: which one should we use? Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2019;220(4):293-6.
3. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Distinguishing pathological from
constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based
studies. Early human development. 2009;85(10): 653-8.
4. Martin CB, Jr. Normal fetal physiology and behavior, and adaptive
responses with hypoxemia. Seminars in perinatology. 2008;32(4):239-42.
5. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on
electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and
research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(5):510-5.
6. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a
medical intervention resulting in preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2006;195(6):1557-63.
7. McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national
guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction:
comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2018;218(2s):S855-s68.
8. Ananth CV, VanderWeele TJ. Placental abruption and perinatal
mortality with preterm delivery as a mediator: disentangling direct and
indirect effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(1):99-108.
9. Vanderweele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Odds ratios for mediation analysis
for a dichotomous outcome. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(12):1339-48.
10. VanderWeele TJ. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct
and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4):540-51.
11. Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for
direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3(2):143-55.
12. Lee H, Herbert RD, McAuley JH. Mediation Analysis. JAMA.
2019;321(7):697-8.
13. Talge NM, Mudd LM, Sikorskii A, Basso O. United States birth weight
reference corrected for implausible gestational age estimates.
Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):844-53.
14. Joseph KS, Demissie K, Kramer MS. Obstetric intervention,
stillbirth, and preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26(4):250-9.
15. Metcalfe A, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. The association between temporal
changes in the use of obstetrical intervention and small-for-gestational
age live births. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:233.
16. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Medically indicated preterm birth:
recognizing the importance of the problem. Clin Perinatol.
2008;35(1):53-67.
17. MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Zhang J. Obstetrical intervention and the
singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006. Am J
Public Health. 2010;100(11):2241-7.
18. Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer SE, Gregory EC. Measuring
Gestational Age in Vital Statistics Data: Transitioning to the Obstetric
Estimate. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics,
National Vital Statistics System. 2015;64(5):1-20.
19. Spong CY. Defining ”term” pregnancy: recommendations from the
Defining ”Term” Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2445-6.
20. Pearl J. Direct and indirect effects. In: Kaufmann M, editor.
Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial
Intelligence. San Francisco, CA2001.
21. Erratum: A Unification of Mediation and Interaction: A 4-Way
Decomposition. Epidemiology. 2016;27(5):e36.
22. VanderWeele TJ. A unification of mediation and interaction: a 4-way
decomposition. Epidemiology. 2014;25(5):749-61.
23. Valeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for
exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical
assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol
Methods. 2013;18(2):137-50.
24. VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity Analysis in Observational
Research: Introducing the E-Value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268-74.
25. Mathur MB, Ding P, Riddell CA, VanderWeele TJ. Web Site and R
Package for Computing E-values. Epidemiology. 2018;29(5):e45-e7.
26. Werner EF, Savitz DA, Janevic TM, Ehsanipoor RM, Thung SF, Funai EF,
et al. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm,
small-for-gestational-age newborns. Obstetrics and gynecology.
2012;120(3):560-4.
27. Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, et
al. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous
Women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6): 513-23.
28. Grant A, Glazener CM. Elective caesarean section versus expectant
management for delivery of the small baby. The Cochrane database of
systematic reviews. 2001(2): Cd000078.
29. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Ischemic placental disease:
maternal versus fetal clinical presentations by gestational age. The
journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of
the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia
and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal
Obstet. 2010;23(8):887-93.
30. Imai K, Keele L, T Y. Identification, inference, and sensitivity
analyses for causal mediation effects. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):51-71.
31. VanderWeele TJ, Mumford SL, Schisterman EF. Conditioning on
intermediates in perinatal epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2012;23(1):1-9.
32. Ananth CV, Schisterman EF. Confounding, causality, and confusion:
the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies
in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):167-75.