Conclusions
In conclusion, we can point out that in case our hypothesis is proved by
calculation for complex atoms and molecules it will give us a
possibility to carry quant mechanic calculations on a new high level
because then we can determine the boundaries of the above-mentionedN ! equivalent areas analytically a priori . In fact, we
suggest a new quant chemistry as it was mentioned in [8].
P.S. It should be admitted that our thought experiment is difficult to
carry in physical space for we have to pass through the zero point of
wave function. This is forbidden by the forces considered in [8] and
responsible for antisymmetry of wave functions. Figuratively speaking,
we don’t know presently if we have enough energy to overcome the forces
of antisimmetry and transfer our electron through this point. This
experiment is easier to carry if the coordinates of other electrons are
being changed. Of course, we don’t know how electrons in atoms and
molecules move. Moreover, we can’t know this in principle if the
uncertainty principle of Heisenberg [12] is valid. By the way, in
the same paper [12] Heisenberg for the first time used the term
“electron trajectory” and considered several thought experiments with
electrons. Electrons don’t stay still without doubt. In Stern and
Gerlach experiments trajectories of electrons were observed but the
electrons were free and not connected with atoms nuclei. However, we are
sure that science does not stand still and is discovering new and
unknown laws of the material world, so the mysterious properties of
electrons will be explained together with value and range of action of
above-mentioned antisimmetry forces in comparison with other fundamental
forces.