REFERENCES:
1. Tellum T, Nygaard S, Lieng M. Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: A Structured Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol [Internet]. 2019 Nov; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712162
2. Dueholm M, Hjorth IMD. Structured imaging technique in the gynecologic office for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2017 Apr;40:23–43. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818130
3. Rees CO, Nederend J, Mischi M, van Vliet HAAM, Schoot BC. Objective measures of adenomyosis on MRI and their diagnostic accuracy—a systematic review & meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2021.
4. Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: An integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;
5. Horton J, Sterrenburg M, Lane S, Maheshwari A, Li TC, Cheong Y. Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;
6. Protopapas A, Grimbizis G, Athanasiou S, Loutradis D. Adenomyosis: Disease, uterine aging process leading to symptoms, or both? Facts, Views Vis ObGyn [Internet]. 2020 Aug 5 [cited 2022 Jun 28];12(2):91. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7431194/
7. Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2018 Aug;51:16–24. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506961
8. Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, et al. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019.
9. Tellum T, Nygaard S, Skovholt EK, Qvigstad E, Lieng M. Development of a clinical prediction model for diagnosing adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018 Oct 1;110(5):957-964.e3.
10. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;
11. Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Ribeiro J, Baracat EC, Abrão MS, Kho RM. Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):257–64.
12. Lazzeri L, Giovanni A Di, Exacoustos C, Tosti C, Pinzauti S, Malzoni M, et al. Preoperative and Postoperative Clinical and Transvaginal Ultrasound Findings of Adenomyosis in Patients With Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.
13. Valentini AL, Speca S, Gui B, Soglia BG, Miccò M, Bonomo L. Adenomyosis: From the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: A pictorial review. Radiologia Medica. 2011.
14. Gonzales M, Accardo De Matos L, Orlando Da Costa Gonçalves M, Blasbalg R, João A, Dias J, et al. Patients with adenomyosis are more likely to have deep endometriosis.
15. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, Laufer MR, Leyland N, Missmer SA, et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr 1;220(4):354.e1-354.e12.
16. Staal AHJ, Van Der Zanden M, Nap AW. Diagnostic Delay of Endometriosis in the Netherlands. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2016 Jul 1;81(4):321–4.
17. Gambadauro P, Carli V, Hadlaczky G. Depressive symptoms among women with endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 220, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Mosby Inc.; 2019. p. 230–41.
18. Agostinho L, Cruz R, Osório F, Alves J, Setúbal A, Guerra A. MRI for adenomyosis: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging [Internet]. 2017 Dec;8(6):549–56. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28980163
19. Munro MG. Classification Systems for Adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol [Internet]. 2019 Nov; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31785418
20. Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2012 Aug;207(2):114.e1-7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22840719
21. Kobayashi H, Matsubara S. A Classification Proposal for Adenomyosis Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(2):118–26.
22. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies*. Bull World Health Organ [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2022 Apr 11];85(11):867–72. Available from: http://www.strobe-statement.org
23. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. 2015; Available from: http://www.annals.org
24. Grant SW, Collins GS, Nashef SAM. Statistical Primer: developing and validating a risk prediction model †. Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2018;54:203–11. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/54/2/203/4993384
25. Meylaerts LJ, Wijnen L, Grieten M, Palmers Y, Ombelet W, Vandersteen M. Junctional zone thickness in young nulliparous women according to menstrual cycle and hormonal contraception use. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;
26. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2010.
27. Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Aug 1];38(3):657–66. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jum.14735
28. Habiba M, Gordts S, Bazot M, Brosens I, Benagiano G. Exploring the challenges for a new classification of adenomyosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Apr 1;40(4):569–81.
29. Aleksandrovych V, Basta P, Gil K. Current facts constituting an understanding of the nature of adenomyosis. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019.
30. Maubon A, Faury A, Kapella M, Pouquet M, Piver P. Uterine junctional zone at magnetic resonance imaging: A predictor of in vitro fertilization implantation failure. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;
31. Hauth EAM, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, Lange S, Forsting M. MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: determination of normal values. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 2007 Mar;17(3):734–42. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16703306
32. Templeman C, Marshall SF, Ursin G, Horn-Ross PL, Clarke CA, Allen M, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug 1;90(2):415–24.
33. Guo SW. The Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis vis-à-vis Endometriosis. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2020 Feb 10 [cited 2020 Aug 3];9(2):485. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/2/485
34. Leyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, Stalf T, Huppert P, Mall G, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;