REFERENCES
I a1. Bhatia N, Basra SS, Skolnick AH, Wenger NK. Aortic valve disease in the older adult. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016;13(12):941-944.
2. Grimard BH, Safford RE, Burns EL. Aortic Stenosis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician.2016;93(5):371-378.
3. Baumgartner HC, Hung JC-C, Bermejo J, et al. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(3):254-275.
4. Saikrishnan N, Kumar G, Sawaya FJ, Lerakis S, Yoganathan AP. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis: a review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics. Circulation.2014;129(2):244-253.
5. Pibarot P, Garcia D, Dumesnil JG. Energy loss index in aortic stenosis: from fluid mechanics concept to clinical application. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1101-1104.
6. Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G. ”Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1655-1661.
7. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Sakr F, Durand LG. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation.2000;101(7):765-771.
8. Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, Kadem L, Pibarot P. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol.2003;41(3):435-442.
9. Altes A, Ringle A, Bohbot Y, et al. Clinical significance of energy loss index in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(6):608-615.
10. Riley RD, Snell KI, Ensor J, et al. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med.2019;38(7):1276-1296.
11. Singh S, Rutkowski PS, Dyachkov A, Iyer VS, Pourafkari L, Nader ND. A discrepancy between CT angiography and transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of the annular size affect long-term survival following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2021;13(3):208-215.
12. Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Vemulapalli S, et al. STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(2):701-722.
13. Daubert MA, Weissman NJ, Hahn RT, et al. Long-Term Valve Performance of TAVR and SAVR: A Report From the PARTNER I Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016.
14. Marullo AGM, Biondi-Zoccai G, Giordano A, Frati G. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis: go with the flow! J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2019;20(10):699-700.
15. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705.
16. Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Cramariuc D, et al. Prognostic value of energy loss index in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1149-1156.
17. Bahlmann E, Cramariuc D, Minners J, et al. Small aortic root in aortic valve stenosis: clinical characteristics and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(4):404-412.
18. Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation.1996;94(8):1934-1940.
19. Jhun CS, Newswanger R, Cysyk JP, et al. Dynamics of Blood Flows in Aortic Stenosis: Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Asaio j. 2021;67(6):666-674.
20. Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C. Vascular wall shear stress: basic principles and methods. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2005;46(1):9-15.