Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.
5. Bourier F, Hessling G, AMMAR‐BUSCH S, et al. Electromagnetic contact‐force sensing electrophysiological catheters: how accurate is the technology? Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.2016;27(3):347-350.
6. Bourier F, Gianni C, Dare M, et al. Fiberoptic contact‐force sensing electrophysiological catheters: how precise is the technology?Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2017;28(1):109-114.
7. Eick OJ. Factors influencing lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal.2003;3(3):117.
8. Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2014;7(6):1174-1180.
9. Conti S, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, et al. Contact force sensing for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, multicenter trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(2):201-208.
10. Virk SA, Ariyaratnam J, Bennett RG, Kumar S. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of contact force sensing on the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation: discrepancy between observational studies and randomized control trial data. EP Europace. 2019;21(2):239-249.