References
Abrahms B, Sawyer SC, Jordan NR, McNutt JW, Wilson AM, Brashares JS.
2017. Does wildlife resource selection accurately inform corridor
conservation? Journal of Applied Ecology 54 :412–422.
Albert CH, Rayfield B, Dumitru M, Gonzalez A. 2017. Applying network
theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to
climate and land-use change. Conservation Biology31 :1383–1396.
Alexander NB, Statham MJ, Sacks BN, Bean WT. 2019. Generalist dispersal
and gene flow of an endangered keystone specialist (Dipodomys
ingens ). Journal of Mammalogy 100 :1533–1545.
Allen AM, Singh NJ. 2016. Linking movement ecology with wildlife
management and conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution3 :155.
Almasieh K, Rouhi H, Kaboodvandpour S. 2019. Habitat suitability and
connectivity for the brown bear (Ursus arctos ) along the
Iran-Iraq border. European Journal of Wildlife Research 65 :57.
Aylward CM, Murdoch JD, Kilpatrick CW. 2020. Multiscale Landscape
Genetics of American Marten at Their Southern Range Periphery. Heredity
124 (4): 550–61.
Beier P, Majka DR, Newell SL. 2009. Uncertainty analysis of least-cost
modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecological Applications19 :2067–2077.
Bond ML, Bradley CM, Kiffner C, Morrison TA, Lee DE. 2017. A
multi-method approach to delineate and validate migratory corridors.
Landscape Ecology 32 :1705–1721.
Bowman J, Adey E, Angoh SYJ, Baici JE, Brown MGC, Cordes C, Dupuis AE,
Newar SL, Scott LM, Solmundson K. 2020. Effects of cost surface
uncertainty on current density estimates from circuit theory. PeerJ8 :e9617.
Brennan A, Hanks EM, Merkle JA, Cole EK, Dewey SR, Courtemanch AB, Cross
PC. 2018. Examining speed versus selection in connectivity models using
elk migration as an example. Landscape Ecology 33 :955–968.
Brondizio ES, Settele J, Diaz S, Ngo HT, editors. 2019. Global
assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem
Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
Carroll KA, Hansen AJ, Inman RM, Lawrence RL, Hoegh AB. 2020. Testing
landscape resistance layers and modeling connectivity for wolverines in
the western United States. Global Ecology and Conservation23 :e01125.
Cerqueira RC, Leonard PB, da Silva LG, Bager A, Clevenger AP, Jaeger
JAG, Grilo C. 2021. Potential movement corridors and high road-kill
likelihood do not spatially coincide for felids in Brazil: implications
for road mitigation. Environmental Management 67 :412–423.
Churko G, Kienast F, Bolliger J. 2020. A multispecies assessment to
identify the functional connectivity of amphibians in a human-dominated
landscape. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information9 :287.
Convention on Biological Diversity. 2010. Aichi Target 11 — Technical
Rationale Extended. Available from
https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/rationale/target-11/ (accessed June 29,
2020).
Convention on Migratory Species. 2020. Resolution 12.26: Improving ways
of addressing connectivity in the conservation of migratory species.
Conference of the Parties, 13th Meeting UNEP / CMS, Gandhinagar, India.
Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Etter A, Salicrup DRP. 2016. Habitat
connectivity in biodiversity conservation: A review of recent studies
and applications. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment40 :7–37.
Di Febbraro M et al. 2019. Integrating climate and land-use change
scenarios in modelling the future spread of invasive squirrels in Italy.
Diversity and Distributions 25 :644–659.
Dickson BG et al. 2019. Circuit-theory applications to connectivity
science and conservation. Conservation Biology 33 :239–249.
Diniz MF, Cushman SA, Machado RB, De Marco Júnior P. 2020. Landscape
connectivity modeling from the perspective of animal dispersal.
Landscape Ecology 35 :41–58.
Dutta T, Sharma S, DeFries R. 2018. Targeting restoration sites to
improve connectivity in a tiger conservation landscape in India. PEERJ6 :e5587.
Elliot NB, Cushman SA, Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ. 2014. The devil is in
the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with
demography. Journal of Applied Ecology 51 :1169–1178.
Epps CW, Castillo JA, Schmidt-Kuentzel A, du Preez P, Stuart-Hill G,
Jago M, Naidoo R. 2013. Contrasting historical and recent gene flow
among African buffalo herds in the Caprivi Strip of Namibia. Journal of
Heredity 104 :172–181.
Fraser H, Parker T, Nakagawa S, Barnett A, Fidler F. 2018. Questionable
research practices in ecology and evolution. PLOS ONE13 :e0200303.
Gallo J A, Greene R. 2018. Connectivity analysis software for estimating
linkage priority. Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, Oregon,
U.S.A.
Gantchoff MG, Belant JL. 2017. Regional connectivity for recolonizing
American black bears (Ursus americanus ) in southcentral USA.
Biological Conservation 214 :66–75.
Goicolea T, Gastón A, Cisneros-Araujo P, García-Viñas JI, Mateo-Sánchez
MC.
2021. Deterministic, random, or in between? Inferring the randomness
level of wildlife movements. Movement Ecology 9:1-33.
Hannah L. 2011. Climate change, connectivity, and conservation success.
Conservation Biology 25 :1139–1142.
Heller NE, Zavaleta ES. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of
climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological
Conservation 142 :14–32.
Hilty J et al. 2020. Guidelines for conserving connectivity through
ecological networks and corridors. Page (Groves C, editor). IUCN,
International Union for Conservation of Nature. Available from
https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49061 (accessed January 18, 2021).
Keeley ATH, Beier P, Keeley BW, Fagan ME. 2017. Habitat suitability is a
poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating
movements. Landscape and Urban Planning 161 :90–102.
Koen EL, Bowman J, Sadowski C, Walpole AA. 2014. Landscape connectivity
for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5 :626–633.
Kranstauber B, Cameron A, Weinzerl R, Fountain T, Tilak S, Wikelski M,
Kays R. 2011. The Movebank data model for animal tracking. Environmental
Modelling & Software 26 :834–835.
Laita A, Kotiaho JS, Monkkonen M. 2011. Graph-theoretic connectivity
measures: what do they tell us about connectivity? Landscape Ecology26 :951–967.
Laliberté J, St-Laurent M-H. 2020. Validation of functional connectivity
modeling: the Achilles’ heel of landscape connectivity mapping.
Landscape and Urban Planning 202 :103878.
Landguth EL, Hand BK, Glassy J, Cushman SA, Sawaya MA. 2012. UNICOR: a
species connectivity and corridor network simulator. Ecography35 :9–14.
LaPoint S, Gallery P, Wikelski M, Kays R. 2013. Animal behavior,
cost-based corridor models, and real corridors. Landscape Ecology28 :1615–1630.
Liu S, Dong Y, Deng L, Liu Q, Zhao H, Dong S. 2014. Forest fragmentation
and landscape connectivity change associated with road network extension
and city expansion: A case study in the Lancang River Valley. Ecological
Indicators 36 :160–168.
Marrec R, Abdel Moniem HE, Iravani M, Hricko B, Kariyeva J, Wagner HH.
2020. Conceptual framework and uncertainty analysis for large-scale,
species-agnostic modelling of landscape connectivity across Alberta,
Canada. Scientific Reports 10 :1–14.
McClure ML, Hansen AJ, Inman RM. 2016. Connecting models to movements:
testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and
dispersal data. Landscape Ecology 31 :1419–1432.
McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB. 2008. Using circuit theory to
model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology89 :2712–2724.
McRae BH, Shah VB, Mohapatra TK. 2013. Circuitscape 4 User Guide. The
Nature Conservancy. Available from http://www.circuitscape.org.
Merrick MJ, Koprowski JL. 2017. Circuit theory to estimate natal
dispersal routes and functional landscape connectivity for an endangered
small mammal. Landscape Ecology 32 :1163–1179.
Newbold T et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial
biodiversity. Nature 520 :45–50.
Osipova L, Okello MM, Njumbi SJ, Ngene S, Western D, Hayward MW,
Balkenhol N. 2019. Using step-selection functions to model landscape
connectivity for African elephants: accounting for variability across
individuals and seasons. Animal Conservation 22 :35–48.
Popescu VD, Kenyon M, Brown RK, Dyck MA, Prange S, Peterman WE, Dennison
C. 2021. Habitat connectivity and resource selection in an expanding
bobcat (Lynx rufus) population. PeerJ.
Pitman RT et al. 2017. Cats, connectivity and conservation:
incorporating data sets and integrating scales for wildlife management.
Journal of Applied Ecology 54 :1687–1698.
Roberts D et al. 2016. Cross-validation strategies for data with
temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography40 :913–929.
Sawyer SC, Epps CW, Brashares JS. 2011. Placing linkages among
fragmented habitats: do least-cost models reflect how animals use
landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology 48 :668–678.
Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin M-J, McRae BH, Scribner K. 2010. Use of
resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for
parameterization and analysis. Molecular Ecology 19 :3576–3591.
Tamme R, Götzenberger L, Zobel M, Bullock JM, Hooftman DAP, Kaasik A,
Pärtel M. 2014. Predicting species’ maximum dispersal distances from
simple plant traits. Ecology 95 :505–513.
Thomas CD et al. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature427 :145–148.
Wade AA, McKelvey KS, Schwartz MK. 2015. Resistance-surface-based
wildlife conservation connectivity modeling: Summary of efforts in the
United States and guide for practitioners. RMRS-GTR-333. U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft.
Collins, CO. Available from
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/48464 (accessed May 4, 2020).
Wallis DW, Hodgson JA. 2015. Condatis: software to assist with the
planning of habitat restoration. Available from www.condatis.org.uk.
Warren DL, Matzke NJ, Iglesias TL. 2020. Evaluating presence-only
species distribution models with discrimination accuracy is
uninformative for many applications. Journal of Biogeography47 :167–180.
Wikelski M, Davidson SC, Kays R. 2020. Movebank: archive, analysis and
sharing of animal movement data. Hosted by the Max Planck Institute of
Animal Behavior. Available from www.movebank.org (accessed June 12,
2020).
Xu W, Huang Q, Stabach J, Buho H, Leimgruber P. 2019. Railway underpass
location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope
(Pantholops hodgsonii ). PLOS ONE 14 .
Zeller KA, Jennings MK, Vickers TW, Ernest HB, Cushman SA, Boyce WM.
2018. Are all data types and connectivity models created equal?
Validating common connectivity approaches with dispersal data. Diversity
and Distributions 24 :868–879.
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Beier P, Vickers TW, Boyce WM. 2017.
Sensitivity of resource selection and connectivity models to landscape
definition. Landscape Ecology 32 :835–855.
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR. 2012. Estimating landscape
resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecology27 :777–797.
Zhang Y, Clauzel C, Li J, Xue Y, Zhang Y, Wu G, Giraudoux P, Li L, Li D.
2019. Identifying refugia and corridors under climate change conditions
for the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana ) in
Hubei Province, China. Ecology and Evolution 9 :1680–1690.