Marine actinomycete Streptomyces variabilis S26 as a biocontrol agent for vibriosis in shrimp larval rearing systems
Solly Solomon1,2, Divya T Babu1, Bhavya Kachiprath1, Deepthi Augustine1, Dhanya Kesavan1, Manomi Sarasan1 and Rosamma Philip1*1Department of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of MarineSciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India - 682016.2Fisheires Survey of India, Cochin Zonal Base, Kochangadi Road, Kochi, Kerala, India - 682005.*Corresponding Author: rosammap@gmail.comAbstractIndiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of antibiotic resistant microbes and the loss of natural flora in aquaculture systems ultimately necessitating the ban of many of the chemotherapeutants in aquaculture. Actinobacteria play a profound role in the biogeochemical cycling in the marine environment and they represent the principal source of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial property. In the present study, 98 marine derived actinomycete isolates were screened for antimicrobial activity against the common aquatic pathogens. A potent actinomycete isolate S26, identified as Streptomyces variabilisbased on 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used for further study. Optimization of the fermentation medium for secondary metabolite production was carried out by response surface methodology (RSM) using DESIGN EXPERT. The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model demonstrated that the model was highly significant for the response concernedi.e., antimicrobial activity as evident from the Fisher’sF- test with a very low probability value [(Pmodel>F) = 0.0001]. Of the 10 different solutions suggested by the software, the most suitable composition was found to be starch, 1.38 %; soy powder, 0.88 %; ammonium sulphate, 0.16 % and salinity, 27.76 ‰. S. variabilis S26 cultured in the optimized production medium was applied in the Penaeus monodon larval rearing system and the total Vibrio count and survival rate were estimated. S. variabilis S26 treatment showed a significant reduction in Vibrios and better survival in the Penaeus monodonculture system compared to the control.Abbreviations: RSM - Response Surface Methodology; SDS - Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate; OVAT - ‘One Variable at A Time’; CCD - Central Composite Design; CFU - colony forming units; PL - post-larvae; TCBS - Thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar; ANOVA - analysis of variance.Keywords: Probiotics; Vibriosis; Streptomyces; Response surface methodology; Larval rearing
Introduction
Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing food sectors globally and provides the richest source of protein. Currently the culture systems are under the threat of various diseases caused by biological and non-biological agents. Among the bacterial diseases mainly the vibriosis causes huge economic loss in penaeid shrimp culture system especially in hatcheries. Vibrio harveyi causes mass mortality of Penaeus monodon larvae [1]. The use and abuse of antibiotics in aquaculture system has led to the emergence of antibiotic resistant microbes and loss of natural flora resulting in restrictions on the usage of chemotherapeutants in aquaculture. Hence the use of probiotics is gaining more importance as they improve the health of the animals without causing any deleterious effects in the culture system. Actinobacteria play a profound role in the marine environment by contributing to the breakdown and recycling of organic compounds [2]. They are gaining importance not only for their taxonomic and ecological perspectives, but also for their unique secondary metabolites notably antibiotics [3,4,5] and enzymes [6]. Despite being such a potential source of bioactive compounds, the probiotic role of actinomycetes mainly in aquaculture systems is comparatively less explored. You et al. [7] proposed the ability of actinomycetes to release antimicrobial compounds, degrade organic compounds and the formation of heat and desiccation resistant spores that can be explored for their possible use as a probiotic in aquaculture. You et al. [8] in 2007 reported the use of marine actinomycetes against biofilm formation by Vibrio spp. in aquaculture systems. Antibiotic production by the microbes is largely dependent on the nature and concentration of ingredients in fermentation medium [9,10]. Influence of particular nutrients on antibiotic biosynthesis is determined by the chemical structure of antibiotic substances [11]. Since the classical method of media optimization has been found inadequate for a full understanding of the response, optimization studies are done using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) or Box Wilson Methodology [12] which is a combination of statistical and mathematical techniques widely used to determine the effects of several variables that influence the responses by varying them simultaneously in limited number of experiments. The present work is aimed to study the anti-vibrio activity of a marine actinomycete S26 for the exclusion of Vibrios from the Penaeus monodon larval culture system.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Microorganisms used for the studyMarine actinomycetes (98 Nos.) already isolated from the continental shelf and slope sediments of the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal and maintained in the Microbiology Laboratory of Department of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of Marine Sciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), India were used for the study. 2.2. Screening of actinomycete isolates for antimicrobial activity The actinomycetes were screened for antibiotic production primarily by the cross-streak method against aquaculture pathogens viz. Aeromonas hydrophila, Bacillus cereus, Edwardsiella tarda, V. alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, Vibrio harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. These pathogens were obtained from National Centre for Aquatic Animal Health, Cochin University of Science and Technology. All theVibrio spp. were streaked on prawn flesh agar medium to improve virulence [13]. Based on primary screening results, secondary screening (Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion) was done with five actinomycete strains (L25, M3, M16, SA14 and S26).2.3. Selection of fermentation (production) medium for marine actinomycetes Loop full of actinomycete spores from the 5 actinomycete isolates were inoculated into 50 ml each of the seed medium (nutrient broth) in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask and incubated for 48 hours at room temperature (28±2°C) on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm. 10 ml each of the seed medium culture was inoculated into the five different production media (Table 1), incubated at 28±2 °C for 10 days and tested for activity against the pathogens. Of the five isolates, S26 was selected for its marked bioactivity and selected for further studies.2.4. Molecular identification of the selected marine actinomycete isolate (S26) The spore suspension of actinomycete culture S26 was inoculated into nutrient broth and incubated in an orbital shaker at 28 °C, 120 rpm for 16-18 hrs. The cells were pelleted at 15000xg for 10 min and then suspended in TEN buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl; 100 mM EDTA, (pH 8.0); 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.0) and 1.5 M NaCl) having 10 % sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS). Proteinase K was then added to a final concentration of 0.1 µg/µl and mixed gently. The suspension was kept at 55 °C for 2 hours for incubation and proper cell lysis. The suspension of lysed cells was cooled to room temperature and an equal volume of phenol equilibrated with 0.5M Tris-HCl (pH: 8.0) was added and gently mixed by slowly inverting the tube for 10 min. The two phases were separated by centrifugation at 5000xg for 15 min at room temperature. The viscous aqueous phase was transferred to a clean centrifuge tube and the extraction with phenol was repeated twice. A third extraction with a 24:1 mixture of chloroform and iso-amyl alcohol was carried out and the aqueous phase was collected carefully. DNA dissolved in solution were precipitated after the addition of 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH: 5.2) and 0.6 volume of isopropanol or 3 volumes of absolute ethanol. Incubation at -20 °C for 12 hrs precipitated the DNA. The precipitated DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000xg for 15 min at room temperature. The excess salt was removed by washing the DNA pellets three times in 70 % ethanol. The DNA samples were dried under vacuum and dissolved in appropriate volumes of TE buffer and stored at -20 °C. Agarose gel electrophoresis was done to check the purity of DNA. The 16S rDNA was amplified using universal eubacterial primers 27F (5’-AGAGTTTGATCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492R (5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’) [14]. The primers were used to amplify nearly full-length 16S rDNA sequences. The PCR programme used involves an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 20 sec), annealing (58 °C for 20 sec) and extension (72 °C for 90 sec), and a final extension (72 °C for 10 min). The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5 % agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (10 µg/ml) to ensure that a fragment of the correct size had been amplified. The gel was visualized on a Gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, USA). The purified PCR product was then sequenced at SciGenom, Cochin, India using ABI PRISM 3700 Big Dye sequencer using the primers 27F, 1492R and 530F (5’-GTGCCAGCCGCCGCGC-3’). Sequences were analyzed and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) algorithm [15] was used to search the GenBank database for homologous sequences (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The sequences were multiple aligned and were used to construct a phylogenetic tree by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [16], using the MEGA-11 package [17]. Bootstrap analysis was based on 1000 replicates. The obtained sequence was submitted to NCBI GenBank under the accession number OQ398385.2.5. Optimization of the production medium (OVAT analysis)Medium B was selected based on the inhibition zone against the bacterial pathogens. Optimization of the medium was done for maximum antibiotic production by the selected actinomycete Streptomyces variabilis(S26). One dimensional screening was done initially to find out the range that has to be selected for further optimization experiment. All experiments were carried out in triplicates to minimize the error. The various parameters selected for the study were salinity, pH and nutrients viz. starch, soy meal and ammonium sulphate. To find out the optimum range of the above variables a definite range of these parameters were selected and applied in medium B.2.6. Inoculation of the media and test for bioactivityYoung culture of S26 in nutrient broth was inoculated into the experimental medium and after incubation for 48 hrs at 28 °C, the modified Kirby-Baur disc diffusion method was employed for testing bioactivity against V. harveyi and the zone of inhibition was measured.2.7. Optimization of Physico-chemical parameters of the production mediumThe initial test range of each ingredient for approaching the optimal conditions was selected based on the experimental results of the traditional ‘One Variable at A Time’ (OVAT) method and was further optimized by a full factorial Central Composite Design (CCD) of the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The experimental design, data analysis and quadratic model building were carried out with the aid of the statistical software Design-Expert (version 6.0., Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA). The optimal levels of the variables were obtained by solving the regression equation and also by analyzing the response surface contour plots using the same software. The software suggested 30 combinations with 16 factorial points (2n: n= no of factors), 8 axial points (2n) and 6 central points for the different ranges of the 4 different media components. The actual values of the variables and the combinations of the design are presented in Table 2 and 3. The effects of media components on antibiotic activity were statistically analyzed with response surfaces and the medium composition was optimized using mathematical equations and response surface plots.2.8. Marine actinomycete Streptomyces variabilis S26 as a biocontrol agent against vibriosis2.8.1. Experimental animalsA batch of apparently healthy post-larvae of Penaeus monodon (PL-18; mean body weight 0.04-0.05 g; PCR negative for White Spot Syndrome Virus) were brought from a commercial prawn hatchery in Kochi (India). They were transferred to aquarium tanks of 30 Liter (L) capacity and acclimatized for one week under laboratory conditions. These larvae were maintained on control diets for a period of one week.2.8.2. Actinomycete cultureSpore suspension of the actinomycete S. variabilis S26 was inoculated into optimized medium and incubated for 3-4 days at 28 °C in an incubator shaker. The biomass was harvested by centrifugation at 10,000xg for 15 min.2.8.3. Experimental designApparently healthy larvae were distributed, 50 each, to 30 L fibre glass tanks containing 20 L sea water. 1 g of the actinomycete biomass was introduced to the experimental tanks and the control tank was maintained without actinobacteria. The experiments were done in triplicate for each treatment group and the control group. Both the control group and the treatment group of animals were fed a commercial diet (Grobest feed ‘smart’ S1). Water exchange was not done to create a stressful environment. Total Vibrio count of rearing water was monitored at 0th, 36th, 72ndand 108th hour intervals on (Thiosulfate–citrate–bile salts–sucrose agar) TCBS agar. The plates were incubated at 28 °C, and the colonies formed on TCBS were counted and expressed as CFU mL-1. The experiment data was analyzed by student’st- test. Significance level for the analysis was set to P < 0.05.3. Results3.1. Screening for the selection of actinomycetes as biocontrol agentsOut of 98 actinomycete isolates subjected for primary screening, only 49 % of the isolates showed antimicrobial activity against the test pathogens. Among the total 48 isolates, eight showed bioactivity against almost all the tested pathogens (Fig.1). About 85 % of the isolates showed marked inhibition against Bacillus cereus. Though a wide majority showed anti-vibrio activity, V. harveyi was inhibited by only 10 % of the tested isolates. With respect to the observation in the primary screening, five actinomycetes with broad spectrum bioactivity were subjected to secondary screening and its bioactivity was confirmed (Fig.2).