Solly Solomon1,2, Divya T
Babu1, Bhavya Kachiprath1, Deepthi
Augustine1, Dhanya Kesavan1, Manomi
Sarasan1 and Rosamma Philip1*1Department of Marine Biology, Microbiology and
Biochemistry, School of MarineSciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala,
India - 682016.2Fisheires Survey of India, Cochin Zonal Base,
Kochangadi Road, Kochi, Kerala, India - 682005.*Corresponding Author:
rosammap@gmail.comAbstractIndiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of antibiotic
resistant microbes and the loss of natural flora in aquaculture systems
ultimately necessitating the ban of many of the chemotherapeutants in
aquaculture. Actinobacteria play a profound role in the biogeochemical
cycling in the marine environment and they represent the principal
source of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial property. In the
present study, 98 marine derived actinomycete isolates were screened for
antimicrobial activity against the common aquatic pathogens. A potent
actinomycete isolate S26, identified as Streptomyces variabilisbased on 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used for further study.
Optimization of the fermentation medium for secondary metabolite
production was carried out by response surface methodology (RSM) using
DESIGN EXPERT. The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model demonstrated
that the model was highly significant for the response concernedi.e., antimicrobial activity as evident from the Fisher’sF- test with a very low probability value [(Pmodel>F) = 0.0001]. Of the 10 different solutions
suggested by the software, the most suitable composition was found to be
starch, 1.38 %; soy powder, 0.88 %; ammonium sulphate, 0.16 % and
salinity, 27.76 ‰. S. variabilis S26 cultured in the optimized
production medium was applied in the Penaeus monodon larval
rearing system and the total Vibrio count and survival rate were
estimated. S. variabilis S26 treatment showed a significant
reduction in Vibrios and better survival in the Penaeus monodonculture system compared to the control.Abbreviations: RSM - Response Surface Methodology; SDS - Sodium
Dodecyl Sulphate; OVAT - ‘One Variable at A Time’; CCD - Central
Composite Design; CFU - colony forming units; PL - post-larvae; TCBS -
Thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar; ANOVA - analysis of
variance.Keywords: Probiotics; Vibriosis; Streptomyces; Response surface
methodology; Larval rearing
Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing food sectors globally and
provides the richest source of protein. Currently the culture systems
are under the threat of various diseases caused by biological and
non-biological agents. Among the bacterial diseases mainly the vibriosis
causes huge economic loss in penaeid shrimp culture system especially in
hatcheries. Vibrio harveyi causes mass mortality of Penaeus
monodon larvae [1]. The use and abuse of antibiotics in aquaculture
system has led to the emergence of antibiotic resistant microbes and
loss of natural flora resulting in restrictions on the usage of
chemotherapeutants in aquaculture. Hence the use of probiotics is
gaining more importance as they improve the health of the animals
without causing any deleterious effects in the culture system.
Actinobacteria play a profound role in the marine environment by
contributing to the breakdown and recycling of organic compounds
[2]. They are gaining importance not only for their taxonomic and
ecological perspectives, but also for their unique secondary metabolites
notably antibiotics [3,4,5] and enzymes [6]. Despite being such
a potential source of bioactive compounds, the probiotic role of
actinomycetes mainly in aquaculture systems is comparatively less
explored. You et al. [7] proposed the ability of actinomycetes to
release antimicrobial compounds, degrade organic compounds and the
formation of heat and desiccation resistant spores that can be explored
for their possible use as a probiotic in aquaculture. You et al. [8]
in 2007 reported the use of marine actinomycetes against biofilm
formation by Vibrio spp. in aquaculture systems.
Antibiotic production by the microbes is largely dependent on the nature
and concentration of ingredients in fermentation medium [9,10].
Influence of particular nutrients on antibiotic biosynthesis is
determined by the chemical structure of antibiotic substances [11].
Since the classical method of media optimization has been found
inadequate for a full understanding of the response, optimization
studies are done using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) or Box Wilson
Methodology [12] which is a combination of statistical and
mathematical techniques widely used to determine the effects of several
variables that influence the responses by varying them simultaneously in
limited number of experiments. The present work is aimed to study the
anti-vibrio activity of a marine actinomycete S26 for the exclusion of
Vibrios from the Penaeus monodon larval culture system.
2.1. Microorganisms used for the studyMarine actinomycetes (98 Nos.) already isolated from the continental
shelf and slope sediments of the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal and
maintained in the Microbiology Laboratory of Department of Marine
Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of Marine Sciences,
Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), India were used for
the study.
2.2. Screening of actinomycete isolates for antimicrobial activity
The actinomycetes were screened for antibiotic production primarily by
the cross-streak method against aquaculture pathogens viz.
Aeromonas hydrophila, Bacillus cereus, Edwardsiella tarda, V.
alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, Vibrio harveyi, V.
parahaemolyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus
aureus. These pathogens were obtained from National Centre for Aquatic
Animal Health, Cochin University of Science and Technology. All theVibrio spp. were streaked on prawn flesh agar medium to improve
virulence [13]. Based on primary screening results, secondary
screening (Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion) was done with five actinomycete
strains (L25, M3, M16, SA14 and S26).2.3. Selection of fermentation (production) medium for marine
actinomycetes Loop full of actinomycete spores from the 5 actinomycete isolates were
inoculated into 50 ml each of the seed medium (nutrient broth) in 250 ml
Erlenmeyer flask and incubated for 48 hours at room temperature (28±2°C) on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm. 10 ml each of the
seed medium culture was inoculated into the five different production
media (Table 1), incubated at 28±2 °C for 10 days and
tested for activity against the pathogens. Of the five isolates, S26 was
selected for its marked bioactivity and selected for further studies.2.4. Molecular identification of the selected marine
actinomycete isolate (S26) The spore suspension of actinomycete culture S26 was inoculated into
nutrient broth and incubated in an orbital shaker at 28 °C, 120 rpm for
16-18 hrs. The cells were pelleted at 15000xg for 10 min and then
suspended in TEN buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl; 100 mM EDTA, (pH 8.0); 100 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 8.0) and 1.5 M NaCl) having 10 %
sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS).
Proteinase K was then added to a final concentration of 0.1 µg/µl and
mixed gently. The suspension was kept at 55 °C for 2 hours for
incubation and proper cell lysis. The suspension of lysed cells was
cooled to room temperature and an equal volume of phenol equilibrated
with 0.5M Tris-HCl (pH: 8.0) was added and gently mixed by slowly
inverting the tube for 10 min. The two phases were separated by
centrifugation at 5000xg for 15 min at room temperature. The viscous
aqueous phase was transferred to a clean centrifuge tube and the
extraction with phenol was repeated twice. A third extraction with a
24:1 mixture of chloroform and iso-amyl alcohol was carried out and the
aqueous phase was collected carefully. DNA dissolved in solution were
precipitated after the addition of 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH:
5.2) and 0.6 volume of isopropanol or 3 volumes of absolute ethanol.
Incubation at -20 °C for 12 hrs precipitated the DNA. The precipitated
DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000xg for 15 min at room
temperature. The excess salt was removed by washing the DNA pellets
three times in 70 % ethanol. The DNA samples were dried under vacuum
and dissolved in appropriate volumes of TE buffer and stored at -20 °C.
Agarose gel electrophoresis was done to check the purity of DNA. The 16S
rDNA was amplified using universal eubacterial primers 27F
(5’-AGAGTTTGATCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492R (5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’)
[14]. The primers were used to amplify nearly full-length 16S rDNA
sequences. The PCR programme used involves an initial denaturation at 95
°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 20 sec), annealing
(58 °C for 20 sec) and extension (72 °C for 90 sec), and a final
extension (72 °C for 10 min). The PCR products were electrophoresed on
1.5 % agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (10 µg/ml) to ensure
that a fragment of the correct size had been amplified. The gel was
visualized on a Gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, USA). The purified
PCR product was then sequenced at SciGenom, Cochin, India using ABI
PRISM 3700 Big Dye sequencer using the primers 27F, 1492R and 530F
(5’-GTGCCAGCCGCCGCGC-3’).
Sequences were analyzed and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
(BLAST) algorithm [15] was used to search the GenBank database for
homologous sequences (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The sequences
were multiple aligned and were used to construct a phylogenetic tree by
the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [16], using the MEGA-11 package
[17]. Bootstrap analysis was based on 1000 replicates. The obtained
sequence was submitted to NCBI GenBank under the accession number
OQ398385.2.5. Optimization of the production medium (OVAT analysis)Medium B was selected based on the inhibition zone against the bacterial
pathogens. Optimization of the medium was done for maximum antibiotic
production by the selected actinomycete Streptomyces variabilis(S26). One dimensional screening was done initially to find out the
range that has to be selected for further optimization experiment. All
experiments were carried out in triplicates to minimize the error. The
various parameters selected for the study were salinity, pH and
nutrients viz. starch, soy meal and ammonium sulphate. To find
out the optimum range of the above variables a definite range of these
parameters were selected and applied in medium B.2.6. Inoculation of the media and test for bioactivityYoung culture of S26 in nutrient broth was inoculated into the
experimental medium and after incubation for 48 hrs at 28 °C, the
modified Kirby-Baur disc diffusion method was employed for testing
bioactivity against V. harveyi and the zone of inhibition was
measured.2.7. Optimization of Physico-chemical parameters of the
production mediumThe initial test range of each ingredient for approaching the optimal
conditions was selected based on the experimental results of the
traditional ‘One Variable at A
Time’ (OVAT) method and was further optimized by a full factorial
Central Composite Design (CCD) of
the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The experimental design, data
analysis and quadratic model building were carried out with the aid of
the statistical software Design-Expert (version 6.0., Stat-Ease Inc.,
Minneapolis, USA). The optimal levels of the variables were obtained by
solving the regression equation and also by analyzing the response
surface contour plots using the same software. The software suggested 30
combinations with 16 factorial points (2n: n= no of
factors), 8 axial points (2n) and 6 central points for the different
ranges of the 4 different media components. The actual values of the
variables and the combinations of the design are presented in Table 2
and 3. The effects of media components on antibiotic activity were
statistically analyzed with response surfaces and the medium composition
was optimized using mathematical equations and response surface
plots.2.8. Marine actinomycete Streptomyces variabilis S26 as a
biocontrol agent against vibriosis2.8.1. Experimental animalsA batch of apparently healthy
post-larvae of Penaeus
monodon (PL-18; mean body weight 0.04-0.05 g; PCR negative for White
Spot Syndrome Virus) were brought from a commercial prawn hatchery in
Kochi (India). They were transferred to aquarium tanks of 30 Liter (L)
capacity and acclimatized for one week under laboratory conditions.
These larvae were maintained on control diets for a period of one week.2.8.2. Actinomycete cultureSpore suspension of the actinomycete S. variabilis S26 was
inoculated into optimized medium and incubated for 3-4 days at 28 °C in
an incubator shaker. The biomass was harvested by centrifugation at
10,000xg for 15 min.2.8.3. Experimental designApparently healthy larvae were distributed, 50 each, to 30 L fibre glass
tanks containing 20 L sea water. 1 g of the actinomycete biomass was
introduced to the experimental tanks and the control tank was maintained
without actinobacteria. The experiments were done in triplicate for each
treatment group and the control group. Both the control group and the
treatment group of animals were fed a commercial diet (Grobest feed
‘smart’ S1). Water exchange was not done to create a stressful
environment. Total Vibrio count of rearing water was monitored at
0th, 36th, 72ndand 108th hour intervals on
(Thiosulfate–citrate–bile
salts–sucrose agar) TCBS agar. The plates were incubated at 28 °C, and
the colonies formed on TCBS were counted and expressed as CFU
mL-1. The experiment data was analyzed by student’st- test. Significance level for the analysis was set to P
< 0.05.3. Results3.1. Screening for the selection of actinomycetes as biocontrol
agentsOut of 98 actinomycete isolates subjected for primary screening, only 49
% of the isolates showed antimicrobial activity against the test
pathogens. Among the total 48 isolates, eight showed bioactivity against
almost all the tested pathogens (Fig.1). About 85 % of the isolates
showed marked inhibition against Bacillus cereus. Though a wide
majority showed anti-vibrio activity, V. harveyi was inhibited by
only 10 % of the tested isolates. With respect to the observation in
the primary screening, five actinomycetes with broad spectrum
bioactivity were subjected to secondary screening and its bioactivity
was confirmed (Fig.2).