Consent statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal’s patient consent policy.

Conflict of interest statement

Felix Harpain reports a grant and lecture fee from Takeda, outside the submitted work. Elisabeth Hütterer and Anton Stift report lecture fees from Takeda, outside the submitted work. Clara Luhn, Hermine Agis, Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp and Christopher Dawoud have indicated they have no conflict of interests to disclose.
Case Report
Corresponding Author: Felix Harpain, MD
Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43-1-40400-69400 E-mail: felix.harpain@meduniwien.ac.at
Keywords: amyloidosis, intestinal failure, glucagon-like peptide-2, teduglutide, enteral autonomy
Total numbers of Figures and Tables: 2 Figures, 0 Tables, 0 Supplementary Figures and 0 Supplementary Tables.
Word count: excluding abstract, acknowledgements, tables, figure legends and references: 2286
Word count abstract : 230
ABSTRACT
Amyloidosis is a heterogeneous disease characterized by tissue deposition of abnormally-folded fibrillary proteins that can manifest itself by a wide variety of symptoms depending on the affected organs. GI involvement among amyloidosis patients is common. Its clinical manifestation often presents with nonspecific symptoms such as weight loss, diarrhea and malabsorption. With no specific treatment existing for GI amyloidosis, therapy focuses on impeding amyloid deposition as well as managing the patients’ symptoms with supportive measures. Here we present an AL-amyloidosis patient with GI involvement and intestinal failure who was successfully treated with the GLP-2 analogue teduglutide. Over the course of treatment with teduglutide, the patient was able to achieve independence from parenteral nutrition and experienced a significant improvement in quality of life as stool frequency and consistency improved, urinary output was stabilized and body weight as well as body composition improved over the course of teduglutide therapy. With no longer being exposed to the burden and associated risks of parenteral nutrition, we were able to reduce the potential morbidity and mortality rate as well as to improve the patient‘s overall quality of life. Intestinal tissue biopsy workup revealed a histopathological correlate for the clinical response; Congo-Red-positive intestinal depositions almost completely disappeared within six months of teduglutide therapy. Implementing intestinotrophic GLP-2 analogue teduglutide may enrich the spectrum of treatment options for amyloidosis patients with intestinal failure who are dependent on parenteral support.
BACKGROUND
Amyloidosis is a chronic progressive disease in which misfolded, insoluble as well as digestion-resistant proteins accumulate in various tissues causing severe structural and functional organ damage (1, 2). As the body is unable to eliminate these accumulating proteins, they permanently disrupt the enzyme function and cell metabolism and thereby impair the function of the organs where they have accumulated. The deposition of these insoluble fibrillary proteins, called amyloids, may affect any tissue or organ. However, the heart, kidneys, liver, nervous system and gastrointestinal tract are most often affected. (3, 4) Several subforms of amyloidosis may be classified based on the involved amyloidogenic protein, the associated clinical syndromes, and the extent of organ system involvement (3).
Within generalized amyloidosis, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is often affected by amyloids primarily deposited in the small intestine (5). The misfolded proteins mostly appear in the muscularis mucosae and stromal tissue affecting the vasculature, nerves and nervous plexuses close by leading to impaired intrinsic peristalsis and absorption (6, 7). Typical symptoms are constipation, alternating constipation and diarrhea, chronic diarrhea, abdominal pain, and malabsorption leading to severe weight loss since enteral nutrient and fluid supply can no longer sufficiently be utilized (7-9). In addition, GI tract involvement also significantly affects the overall survival in amyloidosis patients: Lim et al. observed in a prospective cohort study of AL-amyloidosis patients a 15.84 months survival in patients without GI involvement and 7.95 months with GI involvement. (10)
Intestinal failure (IF), as the worst consequence of malabsorption, is not only associated with increased morbidity and mortality but also associated with poor quality of life (QoL) (11, 12).
IF in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients is caused by surgical bowel resection resulting in patients being unable to meet nutritional needs for enteral autonomy and are therefore dependent on parental support (PS) (13).
A significant impact in treating IF was achieved with the glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analogue teduglutide (14). GLP-2 is secreted from the enteroendocrine L-cells of the terminal ileum and colon and was discovered and described as a key factor in intestinal rehabilitation and growth (15). GLP-2 stimulates the growth of the intestinal mucosa through stimulation of crypt cell proliferation and inhibition of enterocyte apoptosis (16, 17). Additionally, GLP-2 impedes gastric emptying and acid secretion, stimulates intestinal blood flow and increases the intestinal barrier function (15). The drug is approved for patients suffering from SBS with chronic IF and enhances the intestinal absorption of fluids and nutrients and, therefore, can reduce the patients’ need for parenteral support (PS) (18).
To the best of the authors‘ knowledge, this case report is first to present the use of teduglutide in treating AL-amyloidosis-associated IF.
CASE REPORT
In this case report we present a 45-year-old male patient with AL-amyloidosis with renal and enteric involvement (iFLC (involved free light chain) 103.2 mg/l, dFLC (difference free Light chain) 71.1mg/l, kappa/lambda ratio 0.31). The patient was first presented to our hospital after the initial diagnosis of renal AL-amyloidosis of the kidneys was made and transferred with suspicion of gastrointestinal involvement.
The patient presented to an outside hospital with progressive edema of the lower extremities, shortness of breath, massive diarrhea and body weight loss of unknown origin. A nephrotic range proteinuria (Palladini Stage II (19) with a protein/creatinine ratio 24530mg/g, albumin/creatinine ratio 22696mg/g, eGFR of >50mL/min per 1.73 m2) prompted a kidney biopsy with the histopathologic workup clearly revealing an AL-amyloidosis with glomerular deposition of lambda light chains. After having already lost ten kilograms within six months the patient was introduced to our clinical department of hematology and hemostaseology and treated interdisciplinary with our IF unit (see Figure 1 for body weight course).
The patient suffered from massive diarrhea (8-12 bowel movements per day, Bristol stool scale 6-7 (20)), malabsorption, fecal incontinence, leg edema, hypotonic blood pressure and disorientation due to his physical weakness. A bone marrow biopsy showed approximately 20% atypical plasma cells with an aberrant immunophenotype (CD20+/Cyclin-D1+/CD117+/Lambda+) as well as vascular AL-amyloidosis. An initial colonoscopy with random intestinal biopsies histologically confirmed GI involvement by AL-amyloidosis (see Figure 2). In addition to the nephrotic syndrome that led to an extreme protein loss, the severe diarrhea increased the patient’s protein deficiency. Furthermore, the diagnostic workup revealed no cardiac involvement by amyloidosis, staging the patient at Mayo 2012 stage 0 (Troponin T 0.014ng/dl, proBNP 223 pg/ml, dFLC 71.1mg/l) (21).
Symptomatic therapy in terms of antidiarrheal and antisecretory agents and daily albumin infusions was performed. Additionally, the patient received tight-meshed counselling through our SBS unit dietary program. Unfortunately, however, a satisfying improvement of the overall medical condition could not be achieved by it.
The underlying plasma cell dyscrasia was treated with the monoclonal antibody daratumumab and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib: The patient received an induction therapy consisting of three cycles of daratumumab and dexamethasone and nine cycles of daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by a maintenance therapy of daratumumab and dexamethasone. With that treatment, the patient revealed a good hematologic response (iFLC of 31.7mg/l, dFLC of 7.9mg/l). Nevertheless, in terms of organ therapy response, we observed a disease progression: although an improvement of the protein/creatinine ratio and albumin/creatinine ratio with 4459mg/g and 3380mg/g, respectively, could be achieved, renal function deteriorated with an over 25% increase of serum creatinine after nine cycles of therapy (from 1.12 to 2.51 mg/dl with a concomitant decrease of the glomerular filtration rate from 63.63 to 28.07 ml/min per 1.73 m2) (22). We waived periodic 24 h urine protein measurements as those were biased anyway by the massive volume losses caused by the diarrhea.
In addition, the patient continued to be severely malnourished, with a body mass index of 19kg/m2 and laboratory tests revealing his malnourishment. He continued to suffer from severe diarrhea resulting in energy and fluid loss subsequently making him dependent on PS. He was started on a parenteral nutrition (PN) (900kcal/day) and intravenous fluids with additional water-soluble and fat-soluble vitamins, trace elements and albumin (20g) on a daily basis (see Figure 2 for the course of PS). With the PS, the excessive weight loss of the patient (now already over 30 kg in 4 months) could be stopped. Although he was able to maintain his weight with the offered PS, gaining body weight was not possible and his general physical weakness was obvious.
Considering the patient’s course and the prognosis of the disease and his poor QoL, which was severely affected by the diarrhea, the need for PS, and his risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and sepsis, the option of off-label treatment with teduglutide was discussed within an interdisciplinary team. The possibility of achieving enteral autonomy through teduglutide therapy and adjusting him to an optimal diet without the disadvantages of PS was presented to the patient who agreed to a therapy attempt with teduglutide.
At the beginning of the treatment, the patient received an adjusted dose of teduglutide due to his renal function impairment. Nevertheless, the patient showed an excellent response and tolerance to teduglutide so that the dose could be increased to the full, body weight-adjusted dose with improvement of the renal function after three months.
Throughout treatment with teduglutide, the patient’s dependency on PN was eliminated (see Figure 1). The patient’s leg edema also regressed and his physical condition improved due to his body weight gain. In addition, we also observed a symptomatic response as his daily bowel movements were reduced down to two to four per day (with an improved stool consistency, Bristol stool scale 4-5) with a stable daily urine output of around 1000 ml per day (see Figure 1 for urine output over time). The excellent clinical course under teduglutide therapy prompted a follow-up colonoscopy. Analysis of small and large bowel tissue biopsies revealed an almost complete disappearance of the Congo-Red positive material as a potential histopathological correlate to the good clinical response (see Figure 2).
DISCUSSION
This case report presents an AL-amyloidosis patient with severe enteric involvement leading to intestinal failure who was treated with the GLP-2 analogue teduglutide and thereby was able to discontinue PN and simultaneously achieve a good nutritional status. Histological workup revealed that intestinal amyloid deposits nearly disappeared after six months of teduglutide therapy.
Amyloidosis is a poor prognosis disease and is known to manifest itself in a wide array of symptoms depending on the involved organ with most patients having several organ systems involved at presentation (4). The GI tract is often affected in patients with amyloidosis and denotes a significant risk factor for poor prognosis as it nearly halves the median survival compared to amyloidosis patients with an unaffected intestine (7, 10, 23).
GI involvement also played a dominant role in the course of the disease in the here presented case. Unable to be sufficiently alleviated by symptomatic therapy in terms of antidiarrheal and antisecretory agents and daily albumin infusions the general health status worsened over the initial course of therapy. Although the amyloidosis-specific therapy achieved a good hematologic, organ response (GI and renal) was poor. With decreasing physical strength and malnourishment and a significant body weight loss, PS was an unavoidable measure in the course of treatment leading to a stabilization of the health status. However, with PS it was not possible to sufficiently improve the patients’ symptoms and enable a significant body weight gain. Furthermore, due to PS the patient was now also exposed to new risks such as CLABSI, central thrombosis, and intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) (24, 25). Up to 70% of PN-associated deaths are attributable to the infection of the central venous catheter exposing this patient population to a significant health risk (26-28). Besides the well-known metabolic issues and infectious risks associated with PS, patients also need to face psychological problems such as depression and anxiety due to their inability of having normal oral intake, long “hook up” times to PS restricting their mobility on day time and overnight infusions deteriorating sleeping habits (29).
The synopsis of the clinical findings led to the experimental approach of treating the patient with the intestinotrophic growth factor teduglutide, which is currently approved and specifically indicated for the treatment of SBS patients with IF (SBS-IF) (18). The patients‘ AL-amyloidosis with intestinal involvement showed great similarities to the clinical manifestation of SBS-IF. Therefore, treatment with teduglutide presented a great opportunity to achieve an improved nutritional status without exposing the patient to the risks of PS. By activating the GLP-2 receptor, teduglutide is able to induce enterocyte proliferation in the crypts and hindering enterocyte apoptosis at the top of the villi, thereby causing intestinal mucosal growth and subsequently enhancing intestinal absorptive capacity (16, 17). The results of the pivotal prospective randomized-controlled STEPS trial and the open-label extensions revealed that around 20 percent of patients on teduglutide were able to completely discontinue PS (18, 30-32). Nevertheless, subsequent retrospective cohort analyses, unbound to any study weaning protocols revealed much higher enteral autonomy rates (33-36). Especially, the experience at our institution of SBS-IF patients under teduglutide therapy showed a much-improved outcome, with over 90% of patients achieving enteral autonomy and thereby complete independence from PS (37). The experiences with teduglutide at our institution, the similarity of the clinical manifestation of the patient‘s AL-amyloidosis-associated IF to SBS-IF patients and the general good tolerability of teduglutide (38) supported the here presented new treatment approach with teduglutide. Three months into the treatment with teduglutide as well as being closely supervised and supported by a multidisciplinary team within our institution, the patient was able to fully discontinue PN, reduce intravenous fluid intake while at the same time improving urinary output and gaining body weight. After the discontinuation of PN, the patient continued gaining weight, finally reaching a body weight of 65kg and a total weight gain of 10 kg.
Another interesting finding of this case report is the histopathological workup of the intestinal biopsies revealing a potential explanation for the excellent clinical outcome. The patient received a colonoscopy at the initial presentation at our institution where the pathological workup in terms of a positive Congo-Red staining of the biopsy specimens confirmed the diagnosis of intestinal involvement of the AL-amyloidosis. After six months of teduglutide treatment with an excellent clinical response to the teduglutide therapy, another colonoscopy with intestinal biopsies was performed. Histopathological analysis revealed a near total disappearance of the Congo-Red positive stained material with only remnant positive staining in single fibers of the lamina propria of the small bowel and a complete disappearance in the large bowel. As the Congo-Red staining is highly specific for the amyloid deposits, this would mean intestinal regeneration from the amyloidosis.
Nevertheless, an explanation for the observed phenomena is yet to be awaited and needs further research. The intestinal amyloid deposits are usually observed in the stromal compartment and subsequently hinder intestinal function, while current knowledge of the functional principle of the GLP-2/GLP-2R axis involves the mucosal crypt-villus axis as activation induces crypt cell proliferation and exerts anti-apoptotic actions of the enterocytes at the tip of the villi (16, 17). Although the effector tissue is the intestinal mucosal epithelium, the actual GLP-2R seems to be located in non-epithelial cells such as subepithelial myofibroblasts, enteric neurons and the enteroendocrine L-cells with growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor, insulin-like growth factor 1, and ErbB subfamily of ligands transducing the intestinotrophic actions (39-41). The stromal location of the GLP-2R location may hold the key to the unknown mechanism of amyloid clearance under teduglutide therapy in the here presented case.
CONCLUSION
This case report describes a new treatment approach of an amyloidosis patient with IF who was successfully treated with the GLP-2 analogue teduglutide. The treat-to-target goal of enteral autonomy in such patients seems to be of utmost importance as it eases the patients of PS-associated morbidity and mortality while enabling improved body weight and composition as well as QoL.
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1 Clinical response to teduglutide therapy.
Left y-axis depicting parenteral support volume in milliliter [ml], right y-axis body weight in kilogram [kg].
i.v. intravenous ; PN parenteral nutrition ; PSparenteral support ; TED teduglutide .
Figure 2 Congo-Red staining before (A) and after six months (B) of teduglutide therapy.
Panel A depicting Congo-Red staining of small and large bowel biopsies showing conspicuous deposition of intensely stained homogeneous amorphous fibrillary material in the lamina propria (LP) (focal green autofluorescence was noted in polarized light, not shown). PanelB revealed Congo-Red staining of both small- and large bowel biopsies after treatment, demonstrating only single fibers (small bowel) with weak specific red staining within the LP; the biopsy of the large bowel showed no Congo-Red positive depositions.
REFERENCES
1. Lachmann HJ, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6(2):214-20.
2. Merlini G. Systemic amyloidosis: are we moving ahead? Neth J Med. 2004;62(4):104-5.
3. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet. 2016;387(10038):2641-54.
4. Muchtar E, Dispenzieri A, Magen H, Grogan M, Mauermann M, McPhail ED, et al. Systemic amyloidosis from A (AA) to T (ATTR): a review. J Intern Med. 2021;289(3):268-92.
5. Ebert EC, Nagar M. Gastrointestinal manifestations of amyloidosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(3):776-87.
6. Kaiserling E, Krober S. Massive intestinal hemorrhage associated with intestinal amyloidosis. An investigation of underlying pathologic processes. Gen Diagn Pathol. 1995;141(2):147-54.
7. Dahiya DS, Kichloo A, Singh J, Albosta M, Wani F. Gastrointestinal amyloidosis: A focused review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;13(1):1-12.
8. Obici L, Suhr OB. Diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal dysfunction in hereditary TTR amyloidosis. Clin Auton Res. 2019;29(Suppl 1):55-63.
9. Smeets S, Dedeurwaerdere F, Thomaere E, Houthoofd B, D’Hulst L, Wilmes P, et al. Isolated amyloidosis of the gastro-intestinal tract. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2022;85(1):80-4.
10. Lim AY, Lee JH, Jung KS, Gwag HB, Kim DH, Kim SJ, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of systemic amyloidosis with gastrointestinal involvement: a single-center experience. Korean J Intern Med. 2015;30(4):496-505.
11. Amiot A, Messing B, Corcos O, Panis Y, Joly F. Determinants of home parenteral nutrition dependence and survival of 268 patients with non-malignant short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(3):368-74.
12. Bluthner E, Bednarsch J, Stockmann M, Karber M, Pevny S, Maasberg S, et al. Determinants of Quality of Life in Patients With Intestinal Failure Receiving Long-Term Parenteral Nutrition Using the SF-36 Questionnaire: A German Single-Center Prospective Observational Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(2):291-300.
13. Jeppesen PB. Spectrum of short bowel syndrome in adults: intestinal insufficiency to intestinal failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38(1 Suppl):8S-13S.
14. Pironi L. Translation of Evidence Into Practice With Teduglutide in the Management of Adults With Intestinal Failure due to Short-Bowel Syndrome: A Review of Recent Literature. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(6):968-78.
15. Drucker DJ, Yusta B. Physiology and pharmacology of the enteroendocrine hormone glucagon-like peptide-2. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:561-83.
16. Brubaker PL, Izzo A, Hill M, Drucker DJ. Intestinal function in mice with small bowel growth induced by glucagon-like peptide-2. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(6 Pt 1):E1050-8.
17. Drucker DJ, Erlich P, Asa SL, Brubaker PL. Induction of intestinal epithelial proliferation by glucagon-like peptide 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(15):7911-6.
18. Jeppesen PB, Pertkiewicz M, Messing B, Iyer K, Seidner DL, O’Keefe S J, et al. Teduglutide reduces need for parenteral support among patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(6):1473-81 e3.
19. Palladini G, Hegenbart U, Milani P, Kimmich C, Foli A, Ho AD, et al. A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2014;124(15):2325-32.
20. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920-4.
21. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Colby C, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(9):989-95.
22. Muchtar E, Dispenzieri A, Leung N, Lacy MQ, Buadi FK, Dingli D, et al. Depth of organ response in AL amyloidosis is associated with improved survival: grading the organ response criteria. Leukemia. 2018;32(10):2240-9.
23. Rowe K, Pankow J, Nehme F, Salyers W. Gastrointestinal Amyloidosis: Review of the Literature. Cureus. 2017;9(5):e1228.
24. Howard L, Ashley C. Management of complications in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(6):1651-61.
25. Buchman AL. Complications of long-term home total parenteral nutrition: their identification, prevention and treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46(1):1-18.
26. Messing B, Crenn P, Beau P, Boutron-Ruault MC, Rambaud JC, Matuchansky C. Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1999;117(5):1043-50.
27. Messing B. Long-term outcome and quality of life of adult patients on home parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 1995;14 Suppl 1:24-7.
28. Scolapio JS, Fleming CR, Kelly DG, Wick DM, Zinsmeister AR. Survival of home parenteral nutrition-treated patients: 20 years of experience at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(3):217-22.
29. Jeppesen PB, Pertkiewicz M, Forbes A, Pironi L, Gabe SM, Joly F, et al. Quality of life in patients with short bowel syndrome treated with the new glucagon-like peptide-2 analogue teduglutide–analyses from a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(5):713-21.
30. Seidner DL, Gabe SM, Lee HM, Olivier C, Jeppesen PB. Enteral Autonomy and Days Off Parenteral Support With Teduglutide Treatment for Short Bowel Syndrome in the STEPS Trials. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(4):697-702.
31. Schwartz LK, O’Keefe SJ, Fujioka K, Gabe SM, Lamprecht G, Pape UF, et al. Long-Term Teduglutide for the Treatment of Patients With Intestinal Failure Associated With Short Bowel Syndrome. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7(2):e142.
32. Seidner DL, Fujioka K, Boullata JI, Iyer K, Lee HM, Ziegler TR. Reduction of Parenteral Nutrition and Hydration Support and Safety With Long-Term Teduglutide Treatment in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome-Associated Intestinal Failure: STEPS-3 Study. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33(4):520-7.
33. Lam K, Schwartz L, Batisti J, Iyer KR. Single-Center Experience with the Use of Teduglutide in Adult Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018;42(1):225-30.
34. Puello F, Wall E, Herlitz J, Lozano ES, Semrad C, Micic D. Long-Term Outcomes With Teduglutide From a Single Center. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021;45(2):318-22.
35. Joly F, Seguy D, Nuzzo A, Chambrier C, Beau P, Poullenot F, et al. Six-month outcomes of teduglutide treatment in adult patients with short bowel syndrome with chronic intestinal failure: A real-world French observational cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(9):2856-62.
36. Pevny S, Maasberg S, Rieger A, Karber M, Bluthner E, Knappe-Drzikova B, et al. Experience with teduglutide treatment for short bowel syndrome in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(4):1745-55.
37. Harpain F, Schlager L, Hutterer E, Dawoud C, Kirchnawy S, Stift J, et al. Teduglutide in short bowel syndrome patients: A way back to normal life? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46(2):300-9.
38. Pape UF, Iyer KR, Jeppesen PB, Kunecki M, Pironi L, Schneider SM, et al. Teduglutide for the treatment of adults with intestinal failure associated with short bowel syndrome: pooled safety data from four clinical trials. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820905766.
39. Orskov C, Hartmann B, Poulsen SS, Thulesen J, Hare KJ, Holst JJ. GLP-2 stimulates colonic growth via KGF, released by subepithelial myofibroblasts with GLP-2 receptors. Regul Pept. 2005;124(1-3):105-12.
40. Dube PE, Forse CL, Bahrami J, Brubaker PL. The essential role of insulin-like growth factor-1 in the intestinal tropic effects of glucagon-like peptide-2 in mice. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(2):589-605.
41. Yusta B, Holland D, Koehler JA, Maziarz M, Estall JL, Higgins R, et al. ErbB signaling is required for the proliferative actions of GLP-2 in the murine gut. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):986-96.