REFERENCE LIST
Aase, K., Jensen, H. & Muff, S. (2022). Genomic estimation of
quantitative genetic parameters in wild admixed populations. Methods in
Ecology and Evolution, 13, 1014–1026.
Adams, J.R., Vucetich, L.M., Hedrick, P.W., Peterson, R.O. & Vucetich,
J.A. (2011). Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting
environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population. Proceedings of
the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 3336–3344.
Åkesson, M., Liberg, O., Sand, H., Wabakken, P., Bensch, S. & Flagstad,
Ø. (2016). Genetic rescue in a severely inbred wolf population.
Molecular Ecology, 25, 4745–4756.
Allendorf, F., Leary, R., Hitt, N., Knudsen, K., Lundquist, L. &
Spruell, P. (2004). Intercrosses and the US Endangered Species Act:
Should hybridized populations be included as Westslope cutthroat trout?
Conservation Biology, 18, 1203–1213.
Armbruster, P., Bradshaw, W.E. & Holzapfel, C.M. (1997). Evolution of
the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant
mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution, 51, 451–458.
Atsumi, K., Lagisz, M. & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Nonadditive genetic
effects induce novel phenotypic distributions in male mating traits of
F1 hybrids. Evolution, 75, 1304–1315.
Barker, B.S., Cocio, J.E., Anderson, S.R., Braasch, J.E., Cang, F.A.,
Gillette, H.D., et al. (2019). Potential limits to the benefits of
admixture during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology, 28, 100–113.
Barnard-Kubow, K.B. & Galloway, L.F. (2017). Variation in reproductive
isolation across a species range. Ecology and Evolution.
Barnard-Kubow, K.B., McCoy, M.A. & Galloway, L.F. (2017). Biparental
chloroplast inheritance leads to rescue from cytonuclear
incompatibility. New Phytologist, 213, 1466–1476.
Barnard-Kubow, K.B., So, N. & Galloway, L.F. (2016). Cytonuclear
incompatibility contributes to the early stages of speciation.
Evolution.
Barton, N. (2001). The role of hybridization in evolution. Molecular
Ecology, 10, 551–568.
Bell, G. (2017). Evolutionary Rescue. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution
and Systematics, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 48,
605–627.
Boeven, P.H.G., Zhao, Y., Thorwarth, P., Liu, F., Maurer, H.P., Gils,
M., et al. (2020). Negative dominance and dominance-by-dominance
epistatic effects reduce grain-yield heterosis in wide crosses in wheat.
Science Advances, 6, eaay4897.
Bolnick, D.I. & Nosil, P. (2007). Natural selection in populations
subject to a migration load. Evolution, 61, 2229–2243.
Brice, C., Zhang, Z., Bendixsen, D. & Stelkens, R. (2021).
Hybridization outcomes have strong genomic and environmental
contingencies. The American Naturalist, E000–E000.
Buerkle, C.A. (2005). Maximum-likelihood estimation of a hybrid index
based on molecular markers. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 684–687.
Bull, J.K. & Sunnucks, P. (2014). Strong genetic structuring without
assortative mating or reduced hybrid survival in an onychophoran in the
Tallaganda State Forest region, Australia. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society, 111, 589–602.
Burke, J.M. & Arnold, M.L. (2001). Genetics and the fitness of hybrids.
Annual Review of Genetics, 35, 31–52.
Burton, R.S., Ellison, C.K. & Harrison, J.S. (2006). The sorry state of
f2 hybrids: consequences of rapid mitochondrial dna evolution in
allopatric populations. The American Naturalist, 168, S14–S24.
Carroll, S.P., Dingle, H. & Famula, T.R. (2003). Rapid appearance of
epistasis during adaptive divergence following colonization. Proceedings
of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270,
S80–S83.
Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J.H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding
depression. Nat Rev Genet, 10, 783–796.
Chevin, L.-M., Decorzent, G. & Lenormand, T. (2014). Niche
dimensionality and the genetics of ecological speciation. Evolution, 68,
1244–1256.
Clutton-Brock, T. (n.d.). Individuals and populations: the role of
long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and
evolutionary biology.
Cockerham, C.C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning
hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when
epistasis is present. Genetics, 39, 859–882.
Connallon, T. & Chenoweth, S.F. (2019). Dominance reversals and the
maintenance of genetic variation for fitness. PLOS Biology, 17,
e3000118.
Crow, J.F. (1948). Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics, 33,
477–487.
Crow, J.F. (1987). Muller, Dobzhansky, and overdominance. Journal of the
History of Biology, 20, 351–380.
Dagilis, A.J., Kirkpatrick, M. & Bolnick, D.I. (2019). The evolution of
hybrid fitness during speciation. PLOS Genetics.
Darwin, C.R. (1876). The effects of cross and self-fertilisation in the
vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London.
De Lisle, S.P., Goedert, D., Reedy, A.M. & Svensson, E.I. (2018).
Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually
antagonistic selection across taxa. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170415.
Demuth, J. & Wade, M. (2005). On the theoretical and empirical
framework for studying genetic interactions within and among species.
The American Naturalist.
Derry, A.M., Fraser, D.J., Brady, S.P., Astorg, L., Lawrence, E.R.,
Martin, G.K., et al. (2019). Conservation through the lens of
(mal)adaptation: Concepts and meta-analysis. Evolutionary Applications,
12, 1287–1304.
Dobzhansky, T. (1950). Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of
heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila
pseudoobscura. Genetics, 35, 288–302.
Edelaar, P. & Bolnick, D.I. (2012). Non-random gene flow: An
underappreciated force in evolution and ecology. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution, 27, 659–665.
Edelman, N.B. & Mallet, J. (2021). Prevalence and adaptive impact of
introgression. Annual Review of Genetics, 55, 265–283.
Edmands, S. (2007). Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the
relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and
management. Mol Ecol, 16, 463–475.
Edmands, S. & Deimler, J. (2004). Local adaptation, intrinsic
coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation
hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Journal of Experimental
Marine Biology and Ecology, 303, 183–196.
Ellstrand, N.C. (2014). Is gene flow the most important evolutionary
force in plants? American Journal of Botany, 101, 737–753.
Fenster, C.B. (1991). Gene Flow in Chamaecrista Fasciculata
(leguminosae) II. Gene Establishment. Evolution, 45, 410–422.
Fenster, C.B., Galloway, L.F. & Chao, L. (1997). Epistasis and its
consequences for the evolution of natural populations. Trends in Ecology
& Evolution, 12, 282–286.
Fiévet, J.B., Dillmann, C. & de Vienne, D. (2010). Systemic properties
of metabolic networks lead to an epistasis-based model for heterosis.
Theor Appl Genet, 120, 463–473.
Fiévet, J.B., Nidelet, T., Dillmann, C. & de Vienne, D. (2018).
Heterosis is a systemic property emerging from non-linear
genotype-phenotype relationships: evidence from in vitro genetics and
computer simulations. Frontiers in Genetics.
Fitzpatrick, S.W., Gerberich, J.C., Angeloni, L.M., Bailey, L.L.,
Broder, E.D., Torres-Dowdall, J., et al. (2016). Gene flow from an
adaptively divergent source causes rescue through genetic and
demographic factors in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies.
Evolutionary Applications, 9, 879–891.
Fox, C.W., Stillwell, R.C., Amarillo-S, A.R., Czesak, M.E. & Messina,
F.J. (2004). Genetic architecture of population differences in
oviposition behaviour of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1141–1151.
Frankham, R. (2015). Genetic rescue of small inbred populations:
meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow.
Molecular Ecology, 24, 2610–2618.
Frankham, R. (2016). Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3
generation, based on a meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 195,
33–36.
Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Eldridge, M.D.B., Lacy, R.C., Ralls, K.,
Dudash, M.R., et al. (2011). Predicting the probability of outbreeding
depression. Conserv Biol, 25, 465–475.
Fu, D., Xiao, M., Hayward, A., Jiang, G., Zhu, L., Zhou, Q., et al.
(2015). What is crop heterosis: new insights into an old topic. J Appl
Genetics, 56, 1–13.
García-Ramos, G. & Kirkpatrick, M. (1997). Genetic models of adaptation
and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution, 51, 21–28.
Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. (2010). Conspecific versus heterospecific
gene exchange between populations of Darwin’s finches. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365,
1065–1076.
Guo, T., Yang, N., Tong, H., Pan, Q., Yang, X., Tang, J., et al. (2014).
Genetic basis of grain yield heterosis in an “immortalized F2” maize
population. Theor Appl Genet, 127, 2149–2158.
Hayes, H.K. (1946). Yield genes, heterosis and combining ability. The
American Naturalist, 80, 430–445.
Hendry, A.P., Gotanda, K.M. & Svensson, E.I. (2017). Human influences
on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
372, 20160028.
Hereford, J. (2009). A quantitative survey of local adaptation and
fitness trade‐offs. The American Naturalist, 173, 579–588.
Hoffmann, A.A., Miller, A.D. & Weeks, A.R. (2021). Genetic mixing for
population management: From genetic rescue to provenancing. Evolutionary
Applications, 14, 634–652.
Hughes, K.W. & Vickery, R.K. (1974). Patterns of heterosis and crossing
barriers resulting from increasing genetic distance between populations
of theMimulus luteus complex. J Genet, 61, 235–245.
Ingvarsson, P. & Whitlock, M. (2000). Heterosis increases the effective
migration rate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
267, 1321–1326.
Ingvarsson, P.K. (2001). Restoration of genetic variation lost – the
genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 62–63.
Johnson, M.T.J. & Munshi-South, J. (2017). Evolution of life in urban
environments. Science, 358, eaam8327.
Kawecki, T. & Ebert, D. (2004). Conceptual issues in local adaptation.
Ecology Letters, 7, 1225–1241.
Kimura, M. (1962). On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a
population. Genetics, 47, 713–719.
Koski, M.H., Layman, N.C., Prior, C.J., Busch, J.W. & Galloway, L.F.
(2019). Selfing ability and drift load evolve with range expansion.
Evolution Letters.
Kottler, E.J., Dickman, E.E., Sexton, J.P., Emery, N.C. & Franks, S.J.
(2021). Draining the Swamping Hypothesis: Little Evidence that Gene Flow
Reduces Fitness at Range Edges. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36,
533–544.
Kuismin, M., Saatoglu, D., Niskanen, A.K., Jensen, H. & Sillanpää, M.J.
(2020). Genetic assignment of individuals to source populations using
network estimation tools. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11,
333–344.
Kusterer, B., Piepho, H.-P., Utz, H.F., Schön, C.C., Muminovic, J.,
Meyer, R.C., et al. (2007). Heterosis for biomass-related traits in
arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the
triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics, 177,
1839–1850.
Lamkey, K.R. & Edwards, J.W. (1999). Ch. 4- Quantitative Genetics of
Heterosis. In: Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 31–48.
Leimu, R. & Fischer, M. (2008). A meta-analysis of local adaptation in
plants. PLOS ONE, 3, e4010.
Lenormand, T. (2002). Gene flow and the limits to natural selection.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 183–189.
Lowe, W.H., Kovach, R.P. & Allendorf, F.W. (2017). Population genetics
and demography unite ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution, 32, 141–152.
Lynch, M. (1991). The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression
and outbreeding depression. Evolution, 45, 622–629.
Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analyses of Quantitative
Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Massachusetts, USA.
Marr, A., Keller, L. & Arcese, P. (2002). Heterosis and outbreeding
depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population
of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution, 56, 131–142.
Martinig, A.R., McAdam, A.G., Dantzer, B., Lane, J.E., Coltman, D.W. &
Boutin, S. (2020). The new kid on the block: immigrant males win big
whereas females pay fitness cost after dispersal. Ecol Lett, 23,
430–438.
Mather, K. & Jinks, J.L. (1982). Introduction to Biometrical Genetics.
Chapman and Hall Ltd., London.
Matsubayashi, K.W., Kahono, S. & Katakura, H. (2011). Divergent host
plant specialization as the critical driving force in speciation between
populations of a phytophagous ladybird beetle. Journal of Evolutionary
Biology, 24, 1421–1432.
Miles, L.S., Rivkin, L.R., Johnson, M.T.J., Munshi-South, J. &
Verrelli, B.C. (2019). Gene flow and genetic drift in urban
environments. Molecular Ecology, 28, 4138–4151.
Miller, J.M., Poissant, J., Hogg, J.T. & Coltman, D.W. (2012). Genomic
consequences of genetic rescue in an insular population of bighorn sheep
(Ovis canadensis). Molecular Ecology.
Millon, A., Lambin, X., Devillard, S. & Schaub, M. (2019). Quantifying
the contribution of immigration to population dynamics: a review of
methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals. Biol Rev, 94,
2049–2067.
Orr, H.A. (1995). The population genetics of speciation: the evolution
of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics, 139, 1805–1813.
Ostevik, K.L., Andrew, R.L., Otto, S.P. & Rieseberg, L.H. (2016).
Multiple reproductive barriers separate recently diverged sunflower
ecotypes. Evolution, 70, 2322–2335.
Otto, S.P. (2018). Adaptation, speciation and extinction in the
Anthropocene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
285, 20182047.
Paul, J.R., Sheth, S.N. & Angert, A.L. (2011). Quantifying the impact
of gene flow on phenotype-environment mismatch: a demonstration with the
scarlet Monkeyflower Mimulus cardinalis. The American Naturalist, 178,
S62–S79.
Pelletier, F. & Coltman, D.W. (2018). Will human influences on
evolutionary dynamics in the wild pervade the Anthropocene? BMC Biology,
16, 7.
Pelletier, F., Garant, D. & Hendry, A. p. (2009). Eco-evolutionary
dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 364, 1483–1489.
Pfennig, A. & Lachance, J. (2022). Hybrid fitness effects modify
fixation probabilities of introgressed alleles. G3
Genes|Genomes|Genetics, jkac113.
Pfennig, K.S., Kelly, A.L. & Pierce, A.A. (2016). Hybridization as a
facilitator of species range expansion. Proceedings of the Royal Society
B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20161329.
Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. (1989). Visualizing multivariate
selection. Evolution, 43, 1209–1222.
Pickup, M., Field, D.L., Rowell, D.M. & Young, A.G. (2013). Source
population characteristics affect heterosis following genetic rescue of
fragmented plant populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 280, 20122058.
Price, M.V. & Waser, N.M. (1979). Pollen dispersal and optimal
outcrossing in Delphinium nelsoni. Nature, 277, 294–297.
Raunsgard, A., Opedal, Ø.H., Ekrem, R.K., Wright, J., Bolstad, G.H.,
Armbruster, W.S., et al. (2018). Intersexual conflict over seed size is
stronger in more outcrossed populations of a mixed-mating plant. PNAS,
115, 11561–11566.
Raynes, Y., Wylie, C.S., Sniegowski, P.D. & Weinreich, D.M. (2018).
Sign of selection on mutation rate modifiers depends on population size.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 3422–3427.
Reid, J.M., Arcese, P., Nietlisbach, P., Wolak, M.E., Muff, S., Dickel,
L., et al. (2021). Immigration counter-acts local micro-evolution of a
major fitness component: Migration-selection balance in free-living song
sparrows. Evolution Letters, 5, 48–60.
Revardel, E., Franc, A. & Petit, R.J. (2010). Sex-biased dispersal
promotes adaptive parental effects. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 217.
Reznick, D.N., Losos, J. & Travis, J. (2019). From low to high gear:
there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of evolution.
Ecology Letters, 22, 233–244.
Rhymer, J.M. & Simberloff, D. (1996). Extinction by hybridization and
introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27, 83–109.
Rieseberg, L.H., Archer, M.A. & Wayne, R.K. (1999). Transgressive
segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83, 363–372.
Rius, M. & Darling, J.A. (2014). How important is intraspecific genetic
admixture to the success of colonising populations? Trends in Ecology
and Evolution, 29, 233–242.
Roff, D.A. & Emerson, K. (2006). Epistasis and dominance: evidence for
differential effects in life-history versus morphological traits.
Evolution, 60, 1981–1990.
Rundle, H.D. & Whitlock, M.C. (2001). A genetic interpretation of
ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution, 55, 198–201.
Runemark, A., Eroukhmanoff, F., Nava-Bolaños, A., Hermansen, J.S. &
Meier, J.I. (2018). Hybridization, sex-specific genomic architecture and
local adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 373, 20170419.
Saatoglu, D., Niskanen, A.K., Kuismin, M., Ranke, P.S., Hagen, I.J.,
Araya-Ajoy, Y.G., et al. (2021). Dispersal in a house sparrow
metapopulation: An integrative case study of genetic assignment
calibrated with ecological data and pedigree information. Molecular
Ecology, 30, 4740–4756.
Saavedra, C. & Amat, F. (2005). Maternal Effects on Encystment in
Crosses Between Two Geographic Strains of Artemia franciscana. Journal
of Heredity, 96, 713–717.
Schaub, M., Jakober, H. & Stauber, W. (2013). Strong contribution of
immigration to local population regulation: evidence from a migratory
passerine. Ecology, 94, 1828–1838.
Schneemann, H., De Sanctis, B., Roze, D., Bierne, N. & Welch, J.J.
(2020). The geometry and genetics of hybridization. Evolution, 74,
2575–2590.
Shapira, R., Levy, T., Shaked, S., Fridman, E. & David, L. (2014).
Extensive heterosis in growth of yeast hybrids is explained by a
combination of genetic models. Heredity, 113, 316–326.
Simon, A., Bierne, N. & Welch, J.J. (2018). Coadapted genomes and
selection on hybrids: Fisher’s geometric model explains a variety of
empirical patterns. Evolution Letters, 2, 472–498.
Soule, M. (1967). Phenetics of natural populations. II. Asymmetry and
evolution in a lizard. The American Naturalist, 101, 141–160.
Stephens, P.A. & Sutherland, W.J. (1999). Consequences of the Allee
effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution, 14, 401–405.
Stern, C. (1948). Negative heterosis and decreased effectiveness of
alleles in heterozygotes. Genetics.
Stewart, G.S., Morris, M.R., Genis, A.B., Szűcs, M., Melbourne, B.A.,
Tavener, S.J., et al. (2017). The power of evolutionary rescue is
constrained by genetic load. Evolutionary Applications, 10, 731–741.
Sutherland, W.J., Freckleton, R.P., Godfray, H.C.J., Beissinger, S.R.,
Benton, T., Cameron, D.D., et al. (2013). Identification of 100
fundamental ecological questions. Journal of Ecology, 101, 58–67.
Svensson, E.I., Goedert, D., Gómez-Llano, M.A., Spagopoulou, F.,
Nava-Bolaños, A. & Booksmythe, I. (2018). Sex differences in local
adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
373, 20170420.
Szucs, M., Melbourne, B.A., Tuff, T. & Hufbauer, R.A. (2014). The roles
of demography and genetics in the early stages of colonization.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20141073.
Tallmon, D.A., Luikart, G. & Waples, R.S. (2004). The alluring
simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution, 19, 489–496.
Thompson, K.A., Peichel, C.L., Rennison, D.J., McGee, M.D., Albert,
A.Y.K., Vines, T.H., et al. (2022). Analysis of ancestry heterozygosity
suggests that hybrid incompatibilities in threespine stickleback are
environment dependent. PLOS Biology, 20, e3001469.
Trochet, A., Courtois, E.A., Stevens, V.M., Baguette, M., Chaine, A.,
Schmeller, D.S., et al. (2016). Evolution of sex-biased dispersal. The
Quarterly Review of Biology, 91, 297–320.
Vasseur, F., Fouqueau, L., Vienne, D. de, Nidelet, T., Violle, C. &
Weigel, D. (2019). Nonlinear phenotypic variation uncovers the emergence
of heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Biology, 17, e3000214.
Waser, N.M. & Price, M.V. (1989). Optimal Outcrossing in Ipomopsis
aggregata: Seed Set and Offspring Fitness. Evolution, 43, 1097.
Whiteley, A.R., Fitzpatrick, S.W., Funk, W.C. & Tallmon, D.A. (2015).
Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30,
42–49.
Whitlock, M., Ingvarsson, P. & Hatfield, T. (2000). Local drift load
and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity, 84, 452–457.
Whitlock, R., Stewart, G.B., Goodman, S.J., Piertney, S.B., Butlin,
R.K., Pullin, A.S., et al. (2013). A systematic review of phenotypic
responses to between-population outbreeding. Environmental Evidence, 2,
13.
Willi, Y. & Van Buskirk, J. (2005). Genomic compatibility occurs over a
wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
Willi, Y., Van Kleunen, M., Dietrich, S. & Fischer, M. (2007). Genetic
rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations
of a rare plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 274, 2357–2364.
Zavodna, M., Abdelkrim, J., Pellissier, V. & Machon, N. (2015). A
long-term genetic study reveals complex population dynamics of
multiple-source plant reintroductions. Biological Conservation, 192,
1–9.
Zeng, Z.-B., Wang, T. & Zou, W. (2005). Modeling quantitative trait
loci and interpretation of models. Genetics, 169, 1711–1725.
Zhang, L., Hood, G.R., Carroo, I., Ott, J.R. & Egan, S.P. (2021).
Context-dependent reproductive isolation: host plant variability drives
fitness of hybrid herbivores. The American Naturalist, 000–000.