Figures
Figure 1: Location of sampled populations, common gardens and
the geographic range of the hybridizing species. Inset shows the study
area on an elevation map.
Figure 2: Schematic representation ofQ ST categories.
Figure 3: Distribution of transcript expressionQ ST values across gardens.
Figure 4: Relationship between Q STtranscript enrichment, module size and module preservation measures
across gardens (WARM: Low elevation garden – panels a & b );
(COLD: High elevation garden – panels c & d ). The vertical
dotted line indicates cutoff for declaring a module as preserved usingmedianRank and Zsummary score. Only
modules significantly over-enriched or under-enriched forQ ST outlier transcripts have been labelled.