3.1 Behavioral results
With respect to accuracy rates, participants achieved an average accuracy of 97.88% (SD = .14) on flanker trials. Analyses on accuracy rates and RTs only revealed a significant mixing effect for flanker trials. Participants were more accurate on congruent trials (M = 1.00 ± .07) compared to incongruent trials (M = .96 ± .19), t = 177.86, p < .001. Slower responses were revealed in incongruent trials (M = 465 ± 69 ms) compared to congruent trials (M = 403 ± 65 ms), t = 16.91, p < .001. That is, no significant differences were detected between three switching contexts either in RTs, accuracy rates, or the flanker effect.