Informed Inclusion or Tokenistic Tolerance? Thematic Analysis of
Australian Perspectives on Transgender and Gender Diverse Inclusion in
the STEM Workplace
Abstract
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) Australians experience high
unemployment rates and workplace discrimination based on gender
identity, despite protections under federal law. There is, however,
limited research on the specific experiences and perceptions of TGD
people in the Australian STEM workplace. To investigate young adults’
perceptions of TGD people in STEM, we conducted a series of simulated,
semi-structured interviews in virtual reality, during which cisgender
participants (N = 81) embodied transgender or cisgender virtual avatars
and interacted with a transgender virtual interviewer. Our thematic
analysis explores patterns of meaning across participant responses
regarding popularised STEM workplace policies. Given the Australian
socio-political environment, identified themes suggest different levels
of engagement with TGD inclusion, highlighting the influence of public
discourse on acknowledgment of TGD rights and resistance to changing a
cisgender-heteronormative status quo. We classify achievements,
challenges, and areas for intervention that highlight gaps between
symbolic progress and genuine inclusion. Tokenistic actions appear
progressive but fail to address systemic inequities, while informed
inclusion requires cultural shifts toward challenging gender
essentialism and embracing TGD lived experiences. By committing to
meso-level institutional initiatives and consulting on macro-level
societal policies, STEM stakeholders can establish standards for
progress and improve TGD inclusion in the STEM workplace.