Quantitative resistance differences between and within natural
populations of Solanum chilense against the oomycete pathogen
Phytophthora infestans
- Parvinderdeep Kahlon,
- Melissa Verin,
- Ralph Hückelhoven,
- Remco Stam
Abstract
The wild tomato species Solanum chilense is divided in geographically
and genetically distinct populations that show signs of defense gene
selection and differential phenotypes when challenged with several
phytopathogens, including the oomycete causal agent of late blight
Phytophthora infestans. To better understand the phenotypic diversity of
this disease resistance in S. chilense and to assess the effect of plant
genotype vs. pathogen isolate, respectively, we evaluated infection
frequency in a systematic approach and with large sample sizes. We
studied 85 genetically distinct individuals representing nine
geographically separated populations of S. chilense. This showed that
differences in quantitative resistance properties can be observed
between but also within populations at the level of individual plants.
Data also did not reveal clear indications for complete immunity in any
of the genotypes. We further evaluated the resistance of a subset of the
plants against P. infestans isolates with diverse virulence properties.
This confirmed that the relative differences in resistance phenotypes
between individuals were mainly determined by the plant genotype under
consideration with modest effects of pathogen isolate used in the study.
Thus, our report suggest that quantitative resistance against P.
infestans in natural populations of a wild tomato species S. chilense is
likely not the result of specific adaptations of hosts to the pathogen
but of basal defence responses that depend on the host genotype and are
pathogen isolate-unspecific.29 Jan 2021Submitted to Ecology and Evolution 30 Jan 2021Submission Checks Completed
30 Jan 2021Assigned to Editor
02 Feb 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
27 Feb 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
01 Mar 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
12 Mar 20211st Revision Received
13 Mar 2021Submission Checks Completed
13 Mar 2021Assigned to Editor
13 Mar 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
15 Mar 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
06 Apr 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
07 Apr 20212nd Revision Received
08 Apr 2021Submission Checks Completed
08 Apr 2021Assigned to Editor
08 Apr 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
09 Apr 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
Jun 2021Published in Ecology and Evolution volume 11 issue 12 on pages 7768-7778. 10.1002/ece3.7610