loading page

A systematic review of the feasibility and safety of day case nasal and/or palatopharyngeal surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea
  • +1
  • E Tian Tan,
  • Wei Leong,
  • Ovie Edafe,
  • Showkat Mirza
E Tian Tan
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Wei Leong
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Author Profile
Ovie Edafe
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Author Profile
Showkat Mirza
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Author Profile

Abstract

Introduction Recent guidelines suggest obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is not an absolute contraindication for same day discharge following surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the feasibility and safety of day case nasal and/or palatopharyngeal surgery in patients with OSA. Methods We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Quality assessment of included studies was done. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273451). Results A total of 1836 patients from ten observational studies were included. There were 268 (15.4%) nasal surgeries, 738 palatopharyngeal surgeries (42.4%) and 735 (42.2%) combined nasal and palatopharyngeal surgery. The majority of patients had moderate to severe OSA. A total of 860 patients (49.8%) were successfully discharged as day cases. There were no standard criteria for daycase surgery. Post-anaesthetic respiratory events were reported in 86/1750 (4.9%) patients. Oxygen desaturation was the most common respiratory event (83.7%, n = 72). There was no mortality reported. Conclusion Current data suggests day surgery is feasible in carefully selected patients with OSA undergoing nasal and/or palatopharyngeal surgery. Further well-designed prospective studies with an emphasis on the systematic assessment of complications are required to establish safety and daycase criteria.
21 Mar 2022Submitted to Clinical Otolaryngology
24 Mar 2022Submission Checks Completed
24 Mar 2022Assigned to Editor
03 Apr 2022Reviewer(s) Assigned
28 Apr 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
08 May 2022Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
14 May 20221st Revision Received
16 May 2022Submission Checks Completed
16 May 2022Assigned to Editor
17 May 2022Reviewer(s) Assigned
25 May 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
29 May 2022Editorial Decision: Accept
Nov 2022Published in Clinical Otolaryngology volume 47 issue 6 on pages 620-627. 10.1111/coa.13969