loading page

Video Monitoring as a Viable Approach to Assessing Insect-Plant Interactions
  • +3
  • Christina Simokat,
  • Elizabeth Ferguson,
  • Jessica Keatly,
  • Tyler Smith,
  • Mia Lorence,
  • Jasmine O'Hara
Christina Simokat
CSU San Marcos

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Elizabeth Ferguson
CSU San Marcos
Author Profile
Jessica Keatly
CSU San Marcos
Author Profile
Tyler Smith
CSU San Marcos
Author Profile
Mia Lorence
CSU San Marcos
Author Profile
Jasmine O'Hara
CSU San Marcos
Author Profile

Abstract

Insects perform the greatest part of pollination services (Winfree et al., 2011) and insects native to a given habitat can play an irreplaceable ecological role in food webs and plant reproduction (Travis & Kohn, 2023; Pelmyr, et al., 1996; Suarez, et al.,2000). With precipitous declines in insect species over the last decades, it is urgent to document insect assemblages in native plant communities to support conservation efforts. Identifying pollinators and their pollination activity is challenging; emerging methods involve the use of camera traps (Droissart, et al., 2021). In this study, we compare the accuracy of two different methods of monitoring to produce insect assemblage of Encinitas Baccharis (Baccharis vanessae): focal observations and video recordings from camera traps. B. vanessae is a rare, endemic species found in Coastal Sage Scrub communities in San Diego County (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2021). This federally listed species is threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation, which may also be affecting the availability of its insect pollinators (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011). Preliminary results indicate that B. vanessae supports a variety of flower-visiting insect guilds and is in turn supported by diverse pollinators. While focal observations underreported insect activity by approximately half, the proportions of common diurnal visitors were similar with both methods. Camera traps were unable to provide sufficient detail to discern visually similar guilds, but were able to record nocturnal insect activity, which was dominated by moths (Lepidoptera, 82%). While collection protocol in this study did not record the time an insect spent interacting with a flower, moths spent notably longer periods in contact with flowers than most diurnal insects. This study has implications for the effective monitoring of endangered plant species and their affiliated pollinators.
01 Sep 2023Submitted to Ecology and Evolution
04 Sep 2023Submission Checks Completed
04 Sep 2023Assigned to Editor
25 Sep 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
10 Oct 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
04 Feb 20241st Revision Received
05 Feb 2024Submission Checks Completed
05 Feb 2024Assigned to Editor
05 Feb 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
09 Apr 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
11 Jun 2024Submission Checks Completed
11 Jun 2024Assigned to Editor
11 Jun 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
19 Jun 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
21 Jul 20243rd Revision Received
22 Jul 2024Submission Checks Completed
22 Jul 2024Assigned to Editor
22 Jul 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
12 Aug 2024Editorial Decision: Accept