DNA barcoding insufficiently identifies European wild bees (Hymenoptera,
Anthophila) due to taxonomic problems, genus-specific barcoding gaps,
and database errors
Abstract
Recent declines in insect abundances, especially populations of wild
pollinators, pose a threat to many natural and agricultural ecosystems.
Traditional species monitoring relies on morphological character
identification and is inadequate for efficient and standardized surveys.
DNA barcoding has become a standard approach for molecular
identification of organisms, aiming to overcome the shortcomings of
traditional species monitoring. However, its efficacy depends on the
completeness of reference databases. Large DNA barcoding efforts are
(almost entirely) lacking in many European countries, and such patchy
data limit Europe-wide analyses of precisely how to apply DNA barcoding
in wild bee identification. Here, we advance towards an effective
molecular identification of European wild bees. We conducted a
high-effort survey of wild bees in Slovenia, a country where central
Europe meets the Balkan peninsula, and DNA barcoded all collected
morpho-species. For global analyses, we complemented our DNA barcode
dataset with all relevant European species and conducted a global
analyses of species delimitation, general and genus-specific barcoding
gaps, and examined the error-rate in DNA data repositories. We found
that i) a sixth of all specimens from Slovenia could not be reliably
identified, ii) species delimitation methods show numerous systematic
problems, iii) there is no general barcoding gap across all bees, iv)
the barcoding gap is genus-specific, but only after curating for errors
in DNA data repositories. Intense sampling and barcoding efforts in
underrepresented regions and strict curation of DNA barcode repositories
are needed to enhance the use of DNA barcoding for identification of
wild bees.