Heat Transfer Enhancement of Heat sink Conical fin with Inline and
Staggered Arrangement
Abstract
An experimental study was conducted to investigate how the arrangement
of conical fins enhances the performance of a heat sink under forced
convection conditions. Two types of heat sinks were manufactured: a
staggered heat sink and an inline heat sink. The heat sink was
manufactured from AL383 alloy, and the dimensions of the fins are 50 mm
in height, 12 mm in diameter, with a distance of 30 mm between them. The
heat sink is positioned within a horizontal channel. Five different
speeds, ranging from 1.5 to 4 m/s, were utilized with a constant heat
source. A variety of variables were examined, including heat
dissipation, heat transfer coefficient, temperature distribution along
the fin, Reynolds number (Re), Nusselt number (Nu), and heat sink
efficiency. It’s evident from the results that the staggered heat sinks
disperse heat more effectively than the inline heat sink, exhibiting an
8.78% increase in heat dissipation at Re 15000. Furthermore, the
staggered heat sink demonstrates a significant improvement in the heat
transfer coefficient (h), with a 35% enhancement at Re 15000 compared
to the inline heat sink. The Nusselt number of staggered heat sinks
increases with an increase in Reynolds number. The ANSYS program was
utilized to determine the optimal height-to-diameter (B/d) ratio for the
conical fin. While the diameter could vary from 8 mm to 16 mm, the
height remained constant at 50 mm. Consequently, the ratio was tested at
(6.2, 5, 4, 3.5, 3.1). The staggered heat sink dissipated 8.78% more
heat than the linear heat sink at Re 15000. The heat transfer
coefficient (h) value increases by 35% at Re 15000 for the staggered
heat sink compared with the linear heat sink. Additionally, the Nusselt
number increases with the rise in the Reynolds number (Re) and is higher
for the staggered then the inline heat sink by 45% at Re 15000. Also,
the results clearly convey the finding that the efficiency at Re 15000,
the staggered heat sink outperforms the inline heat sink by 7.24%.
Additionally, the optimal ratio for dispersing heats throughout the
fin’s length was (B/d=4).