Toxicity spectrum of taxanes: A safety analysis from pre-marketing to
post-marketing
Abstract
Aim: To comprehensively evaluate the toxicity spectrum of taxanes from
the perspective of clinical trials and the real world. Method: Pooled
analyses were performed to estimate incidences of adverse events (AEs)
with random-effect models after searching databases. Reports of AEs were
obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event
Reporting System (FAERS) database and positive signals were quantified
by conducting disproportionality analysis. Results: A total of 7
formulations were analyzed in this study with 36 clinical trials
involving 10828 patients and 58835 case reports from FAERS. Leukopenia
(59.69%, 95% confidence interval 41.34-75.69) and neutropenia
(29.69%, 23.31-36.99) ranked first among all grades and severe AEs,
respectively. Alopecia had the highest estimated incidences of
non-hematological AEs regardless of grades. Paclitaxel has identified
561 positive signals while its AEs were not the most severe. Docetaxel
had the least signals but alopecia and depression had quantified several
signals. The estimated incidences of nab-paclitaxel were higher than
other formulations, especially neutropenia (46.53%, 35.01-58.42).
Conclusion: The safety of nab-paclitaxel was beyond expectation and
unusual signals of alopecia and depression of docetaxel need to be paid
attention to. Most common AEs in clinical trials also had positive
signals in FAERS, indicating consistency between premarket and
postmarket studies.