loading page

Ear-canal lavage for curing noninvasive otomycosis: A prospective randomized controlled trial
  • +5
  • Lihua Tang,
  • Fan Song,
  • Yusheng Du,
  • Zelin Cui,
  • Jia Zhang,
  • Xingyu Mei,
  • Guoliang Wang,
  • Zhenghua Zhu
Lihua Tang
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Fan Song
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Yusheng Du
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Zelin Cui
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Jia Zhang
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Xingyu Mei
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Guoliang Wang
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics
Author Profile
Zhenghua Zhu
Shanghai Jiaotong University First People's Hospital Department of Orthopaedics

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Objective Fungal infection of the external auditory canal, otomycosis, is generally a resistant mycotic infection. We designed a prospective, randomized, controlled cohort study to analyse the treatment effect of ear canal lavage on otomycosis. Methods The clinical patients were divided into two groups: an irrigation group and an irrigation + local drug treatment control group. Results From January 2022 to December 2023, a total of 102 patients treated for otomycosis were enrolled, and 98 of the patients were followed up for three months. Twenty-two of the 98 patients (22.45%) had no or minor symptoms. Other common symptoms such as pruritus, pain, hearing impairment, etc., presented solely or in combination (Table 1). Our fungal culture results revealed that, in 83 patients (84.69%) the otomycotic pathogen was Aspergillus. In the lavage group, 48 (48/52, 92.30%) patients were cured with initial treatment after three months of follow-up, two (2/52, 3.85%) patients were cured after one month but were lost to follow-up after three months, and two (2/52, 3.85%) patients failed after initial treatment, received topical miconazole ointment treatment and were eventually cured. In the irrigation + local drug control group, 48 (48/50, 96.00%) subjects responded to initial treatment without recurrent disease after three months; 2 (2/50, 4.00%) subjects were lost to follow-up. According to Fisher’s exact test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (Table 3, P = 0.258). Conclusion Both ear canal rinses and local antifungal creams are effective, and sequential treatment via both methods is reasonable.
03 Jul 2024Submitted to Clinical Otolaryngology
12 Jul 2024Submission Checks Completed
12 Jul 2024Assigned to Editor
30 Aug 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned