loading page

Offspring of migratory European pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) incur fitness costs from an ecological trap based on nest box selection in pest insect outbreak-affected forest
  • +7
  • Colton Adams,
  • Ronalds Krams,
  • Didzis Elferts,
  • Guntis Brumelis,
  • Iluta Dauskane,
  • Linda Strode,
  • Agnis Smits,
  • Giedrius Trakimas,
  • Indrikis Krams,
  • Tatjana Krama
Colton Adams
The University of Tennessee Knoxville

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Ronalds Krams
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre
Author Profile
Didzis Elferts
Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava
Author Profile
Guntis Brumelis
University of Latvia
Author Profile
Iluta Dauskane
University of Latvia
Author Profile
Linda Strode
University of Latvia
Author Profile
Agnis Smits
Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava
Author Profile
Giedrius Trakimas
Daugavpils University
Author Profile
Indrikis Krams
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre
Author Profile
Tatjana Krama
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre
Author Profile

Abstract

When selecting a habitat for breeding and offspring rearing, it is optimal for organisms to select a stable habitat with high amounts of quality resources. However, organisms may inadvertently select a habitat for breeding that would initially appear preferential and healthy but may, in reality, be detrimental to parent and/or offspring fitness. Such ecological traps may even be the result of human habitat modification and conservation efforts. In this study, we tested whether migratory European pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) offspring cavity-nesting in patches of forest affected by outbreaks of the great web-spinning sawfly (Acantholyda posticalis) incurred fitness detriments characteristic of ecological traps when compared to flycatchers that nested in patches of unaffected forest. Outbreaking sawfly larvae overconsume Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) needles and substrate, which decreases resource availability directly and indirectly – through cascading effects – for birds inhabiting the forest. In installing nest boxes to attract breeding pairs and potentially combat the outbreak, we found that flycatchers inhabiting areas of sawfly outbreaks had similar clutch sizes to pairs breeding in healthy forest patches. Contrarily, the fledgling number and body condition were significantly lower for those nesting in the damaged forests. Though larvae serve as the primary food source for nestlings, the forest patches damaged by sawflies also had lower larval biomass from rapid resource decline due to overconsumption. In provisioning nest boxes for migrating flycatcher pairs in forest patches that were subsequently impacted by a pest insect outbreak, an ecological trap arose for those pairs choosing to nest in what appeared to be an unaffected forest at first. Given the inability of breeding pairs to distinguish habitat quality on initial inspection, we suggest that nest boxes be used with caution in areas with unstable habitat conditions when attracting migratory birds given the trends of their declining global numbers.
02 Nov 2024Submitted to Journal of Avian Biology
04 Nov 2024Submission Checks Completed
04 Nov 2024Assigned to Editor
04 Nov 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Nov 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned