Beyond the Illusion of Controlled Environments: How to embrace
Ecological Pertinence in Research?
Abstract
Through the lens of preclinical research on substance use disorders
(SUD), I propose a reflection aimed at reevaluating animal models in
neuroscience, with a focus on ecological relevance. While rodent models
have provided valuable insights into the neurobiology of SUD, the field
currently faces a validation crisis, with findings often failing to
translate into effective human treatments. Originally designed to
address the lack of reproducibility in animal studies, the current
global gold standard of rigorous standardization has led to increasingly
controlled environments. This growing disconnection between laboratory
settings and real-world scenarios exacerbates the validation crisis.
Rodent models have also revealed various environmental influences on
drug use and its neural mechanisms, highlighting parallels with human
behavior and underscoring the importance of ecological relevance in
behavioral research. Drawing inspiration from inquiries in ethology and
evolutionary biology, I advocate for incorporating greater environmental
complexity into animal models. In line with this idea, the
neuroethological approach involves studying spontaneous behaviors in
semi-natural habitats while utilizing advanced technologies to monitor
neural activity. Although this framework offers new insights into human
neuroscience, it does not adequately capture the complex human
conditions that lead to neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore,
preclinical research should prioritize understanding the environmental
factors that shape human behavior and neural architecture, integrating
these insights into animal models. By emphasizing ecological relevance,
we can achieve deeper insights into neuropsychiatric disorders and
develop more effective treatment strategies. This approach highlights
significant benefits for both scientific inquiry and ethical
considerations.