Reward and feedback processing in voluntary task-switching: joint
evidence from pupillometry and EEG
Abstract
Abstract: Cognitive flexibility has been shown to be heavily influenced
by sequential changes in the amount of reward available. When available
reward remains constant, participants favor stability and are more
likely to repeat tasks; when available reward changes, they favor
flexibility and are more likely to switch tasks. However, past work in
this area hasn’t considered what happens when the available reward is
not received, e.g., when responses are too slow to receive
performance-contingent rewards. If participants are mainly influenced by
dynamics in available rewards (rather than outcomes), such outcomes may
not affect their behavior. Alternatively, the failure to receive an
anticipated reward may be treated as an aversive signal, biasing
participants to shift away from the previous task. In the current study,
we used EEG and pupillometry to examine the neural response during
reward cues and feedback to dissociate these two possibilities.
Behaviorally, we found that participants switch more after failing to
receive a high reward due to a slow response than after receiving a high
reward. Neurally, we found increased pupil dilation and theta power in
response to slow response feedback compared to low reward feedback.
Taken together, these results suggest that receiving feedback that the
response was too slow increases arousal and shifts behavior to favor
flexibility.