International guidelines have recommended the use of inhaled beta-2 agonists and systemic corticosteroids (SC) as the first-line treatment for acute asthma. Objective: To evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in addition to SC compared to SC alone in children with acute asthma in the ED or during hospitalization. Data sources: Five electronic databases were searched. Study Selection: All RCTs that compared ICS (via nebulizer or metered dose inhaler) plus SC (oral or parenteral) with placebo (or standard care) plus SC were included without language restriction. Data extraction: Two reviewers independently reviewed all studies. The primary outcomes were hospital admission or hospital length of stay [LOS], and secondary outcomes were readmissions during follow-up, ED-LOS, lung function, asthma clinical score, oxygen saturation, and heart and respiratory rates. Results: Nine studies (n=1473) met the inclusion criteria. In all the studies, the ICS was budesonide. Compared to SC alone, adding budesonide to SC did not affect hospitalization rate, but decreased hospital LOS by more than one day (MD= -29.08 hours [-39.9 to -18.3]; I2=0%, p=<0.00001). Moreover, adding budesonide (especially with ≥2mg doses) significantly improved the acute asthma severity score among patients at ED. Conclusions: Compared to SC alone, adding budesonide to SC did not affect hospitalization rate, but decreases the LOS and improves the acute asthma score in children at ED setting.

Introduction Despite the evidence supporting the use of intravenous Magnesium Sulfate (MS) in acute asthma; this drug continues being considered as the second line in pediatric acute asthma exacerbations. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the MS in acute asthma. Methods A decision tree model was used to estimate the Cost-utility study that compared MS versus standard treatment (control group) in an infant with acute asthma in the emergency setting. Cost data were obtained from a retrospective study on asthma from tertiary centers in Rionegro, Colombia, while utilities were collected from the literature. The analysis was carried out from a societal perspective. Results The model showed that MS for treating pediatric patient with acute asthma, was associated with lower total cost than standard therapy (US $1149 vs US $1598 average cost per patient), and higher QALYs ( 0.60 vs 0.52 average per patient); showing dominance. the probabilty that MS provides a more cost-effective use of resources compared with standard therapy exceeds 99% for all willingness to pay thresholds Conclusion MS in emergency settings was cost-effective for the hospital treatment of an infant with asthma moderate or severe. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines and should be replicated to validate their results in other middle-income countries.

Rationale: Whether asthma constitutes a risk factor for COVID-19 is unclear. Here we aimed to assess whether asthma, the most common chronic disease in children, is a risk factor for COVID-19 in pediatric populations. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in three stages: First, we reviewed PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL for systematic reviews of SARS-CoC-2 and COVID-19 in pediatric populations, and reviewed their primary articles; second, we searched PubMed for studies on COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 and asthma/wheeze, and evaluated whether the resulting studies included pediatric populations; third, we repeated the second search in BioRxiv.org and MedRxiv.org to find pre-prints that may have information on pediatric asthma. Results: In the first search, eight systematic reviews were found, of which five were done in pediatric population; after reviewing 67 primary studies we found no data on pediatric asthma as a comorbidity for COVID-19. In the second search, we found 34 results in PubMed, of which five reported asthma in adults, but none included data on children. In the third search, 23 pre-prints in MedRxiv were identified with data on asthma, but again none with pediatric data. We found only one report by the U.S. CDC stating that 40/345 (~11.5%) children with data on chronic conditions had “chronic lung diseases including asthma”. Conclusion: There is scarcely any data on whether childhood asthma (or other pediatric respiratory diseases) constitute risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 severity. Studies are needed that go beyond counting the number of cases in the pediatric age range.

Lung transplantation is recognized as a treatment option for selected patients with end-stage lung disease and pulmonary vascular disorders. Overall, pulmonary hypertension (PH) is the second most frequent indication for children requiring lung transplantation. Pediatric lung transplantation can be complex; in PH patients timing for listing and the perioperative management can be particularly challenging making interdisciplinary collaboration with the referring PH team essential. Because pediatric patients typically have preserved cardiac index and exercise tolerance even with advanced disease, they should be referred early even if they do not meet the proposed criteria for listing by ISHLT published in 2015: NYHA functional class III or IV without improvement, cardiac index < 2 liters/min/m^2, mean right atrial pressure of > 15 mmHg. Bridging strategies with extracorporeal support should be determined at time of listing prior to transplantation anticipating the possibility of clinical deterioration. Bilateral lung transplantation using cardiopulmonary bypass to provide hemodynamics stability is the standard practice in pediatric centers. The immediate post-transplant period is characterized by dramatic normalization of PVR as well as changes in the RV and LV physiology and function which can be life-threatening. Induction, immunosuppression, prophylaxis and surveillance are not different from patients without PH. Overall, outcomes in pediatric lung and heart-lung transplant patients for PH are not different from those children undergoing lung or heart-lung transplant for other indications. In fact, long-term survival is superior in children with idiopathic PH compared to other diseases, there is also a dramatic improvement in quality of life in most recipients

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a serious health problem worldwide. In the pediatric population, currently available epidemiological data seem reassuring as the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is much lower than in adults, with less critical cases and very few deaths. At present, there are no evidence-based studies on chest imaging in pediatric COVID-19. Chest X-rays showed non-specific findings and chest computed tomography (CT) exhibited similar, but fairly less severe CT changes compared to adult. Moreover, in approximately 50% of pediatric patients no correlation was found between chest CT imaging results and clinical characteristics. Lung ultrasound is rarely used, despite its unquestionable benefits as it can be performed at bed-side with a portable device, which minimizes virus transmission, is cheap and can be easily repeated. In conclusion, the chest imaging use in children, who are typically spared from severe infection, deserve recommendations different than adults also considering the increased risk of radiations exposure. In view of this, pediatric comparative studies among different chest imaging techniques, either less or more invasive, are urgently needed possibly after standardization of interpretation criteria of lung ultrasound.