In modern software development, choosing the right branching strategy is essential for optimizing team collaboration, managing production releases, handling hotfixes, and minimizing merge conflicts. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of three prominent Git branching models-Gitflow, Gitflow Workflow, and Git OneFlow-each offering unique approaches to streamline development workflows and maintain code quality. Gitflow provides a structured framework for managing parallel development, releases, and hotfixes, but its complexity can introduce management overhead. Gitflow Workflow offers a more flexible adaptation of Gitflow, balancing structure and simplicity, while Git OneFlow simplifies the branching model to focus on continuous integration and deployment practices. This study explores the key features, advantages, and complexities of each model, and proposes optimizations to reduce complexity and enhance the development process. The insights provided guide development teams in selecting the most appropriate branching strategy based on project complexity, team size, and codebase ownership, ultimately leading to more efficient and effective software delivery