loading page

Benchmarking DNA Methylation Assays for Marine Invertebrates
  • Groves Dixon,
  • Mikhail Matz
Groves Dixon
University of Texas

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Mikhail Matz
University of Texas at Austin, University of Texas at Austin
Author Profile

Abstract

Abstract: Interrogation of chromatin modifications, such as DNA methylation, has potential to improve forecasting and conservation of marine ecosystems. The standard method for assaying DNA methylation (Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing), however, is too costly to apply at the scales required for ecological research. Here we evaluate different methods for measuring DNA methylation for ecological epigenetics. We compare Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS) with Methylated CpG Binding Domain Sequencing (MBD-seq), and a modified version of MethylRAD we term methylation-dependent Restriction site-Associated DNA sequencing (mdRAD). We evaluate these three assays in measuring variation in methylation across the genome, between genotypes, and between polyp types in the reef-building coral Acropora millepora. We find that all three assays measure absolute methylation levels similarly, with tight correlations for methylation of gene bodies (gbM), as well as exons and 1Kb windows. Correlations for differential gbM between genotypes were weaker, but still concurrent across assays. We detected little to no reproducible differences in gbM between polyp types. We conclude that MBD-seq and mdRAD are reliable cost-effective alternatives to WGBS. Moreover, the considerably lower sequencing effort required for mdRAD to produce comparable methylation estimates makes it particularly useful for ecological epigenetics.
16 Apr 2020Submitted to Molecular Ecology Resources
01 May 2020Submission Checks Completed
01 May 2020Assigned to Editor
08 May 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
02 Jun 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
15 Jun 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
17 Sep 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
17 Sep 20201st Revision Received
02 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Accept