loading page

Molecular epidemiology of ovine papillomavirus infections among sheep in Southern Italy
  • +3
  • Francesca De Falco,
  • Anna Cutarelli,
  • Nicola D'Alessio,
  • Pellegrino Cerino,
  • Cornel Catoi,
  • Sante Roperto
Francesca De Falco
Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali
Author Profile
Anna Cutarelli
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna Sezione di Sondrio
Author Profile
Nicola D'Alessio
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna Sezione di Sondrio
Author Profile
Pellegrino Cerino
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna Sezione di Sondrio
Author Profile
Cornel Catoi
Universitatea de Stiinte Agricole si Medicina Veterinara Cluj-Napoca Facultatea de Agricultura
Author Profile
Sante Roperto
Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Ovine papillomaviruses (OaPVs) were detected and quantified, for the first time, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) via liquid biopsy of 165 clinically healthy sheep. OaPV DNA was detected in 126 blood samples (~76.4%). DdPCR detected OaPV DNA in 124 samples; in only two additional samples positive for real-time qPCR, ddPCR failed to detect the presence of any OaPVs. In 70 of the positive samples (~55.6%), a single OaPV infection was observed, 12 of which were caused by OaPV1 (~17.1%) and 14 by OaPV2 (20%). OaPV3 was responsible for 19 single infections (~27.1%), and OaPV4 for 25 single infections (~35.7%). Multiple OaPV coinfections were observed in 56 (~44.4%) positive samples. OaPV coinfections caused by two genotypes were observed in 31 positive samples (~55.4%), with dual OaPV3/OaPV4 infection being the most prevalent as seen in 11 blood samples. In addition, five OaPV1/OaPV4, four OaPV1/OaPV2, four OaPV2/OaPV3, four OaPV1/OaPV3, and three OaPV2/OaPV4 dual coinfections were also detected. OaPV coinfections by triple and quadruple genotypes were detected in 24 (~42.8%) and only one (~1.8%) of coinfected blood samples, respectively. Multiple infections caused by OaPV1/OaPV3/OaPV4 genotypes were the most prevalent, as observed in 12 (50%) blood samples harboring triple OaPV infections. This study showed that ddPCR is the most sensitive and accurate assay for OaPV detection and quantification thus outperforming real-time qPCR in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, ddPCR may represent the molecular diagnostic tool of choice, ultimately providing useful insights into OaPV molecular epidemiology and field surveillance.