loading page

Foliar nutrient-allocation patterns in Banksia attenuata and Banksia sessilis differing in growth rate and adaptation to low-phosphorus habitats
  • +3
  • Zhongming Han,
  • Jianmin Shi,
  • Jiayin Pang,
  • Li Yan,
  • Patrick Finnegan,
  • Hans Lambers
Zhongming Han
Jilin Agricultural University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jianmin Shi
Jiangxi Agricultural University
Author Profile
Jiayin Pang
The University of Western Australia
Author Profile
Li Yan
University of Western Australia
Author Profile
Patrick Finnegan
University of Western Australia
Author Profile
Hans Lambers
The University of Western Australia
Author Profile

Abstract

We compared the use of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) in slow-growing Banksia attenuata (Proteaceae), which resprouts after fire and naturally occurs on deep sand, with faster-growing opportunistic B. sessilis, which is killed by fire and occurs on shallow sand over laterite or limestone. We carried out pot experiments with plants on substrates with different P availability. We measured foliar nutrient concentrations, and P allocated to major biochemical fractions. The two species had similar foliar total P concentrations, but distinct patterns of P allocation to P-containing fractions. The foliar total N concentration of B. sessilis was greater than that of B. attenuata on all substrates. The foliar total P and N concentrations in both species decreased with decreasing P availability. The relative growth rate of both species was positively correlated with both foliar nucleic acid P and total N concentrations, but there was no correlation with other P and N fractions. Faster-growing B. sessilis allocated more P to nucleic acids than B. attenuata did, but other fractions were similar. We conclude that the nutrient-allocation patterns in faster-growing opportunistic B. sessilis and slower-growing B. attenuata revealed different strategies in response to soil P availability, which matched their contrasting growth strategy.
03 Feb 2021Published in Annals of Botany. 10.1093/aob/mcab013