You need to sign in or sign up before continuing. dismiss

Alex Hoover

and 7 more

BACKGROUND: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy of childhood. With the introduction of novel cellular therapies, cost of care is a critical component and financial toxicity experienced by patients and society requires evaluation. This study aims to assess the total cost of CAR-T therapy for pediatric ALL patients with commercial insurance coverage in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Using de-identified commercial insurance data from the OptumLabs ® Data Warehouse, a cohort of 37 patients, aged 1-25 years, with B-ALL treated with CAR-T therapy between Oct 2016 and Dec 2021 in the United States was identified. Cost was evaluated for a 90 day period encompassing CAR-T infusion and by administration and complication characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 37 identified ALL patients that received a CAR-T product infusion, 14 patients were female, median age at administration was 13 years. The median 90-day total cost was $620,500 (Mean: $589,108). Inpatient cost accounted for approximately 71% of the total cost with an average of 28 inpatient days per patient. Although inpatient cost was slightly higher in the older age group (aged 10-25 years) and in patients with a code for CRS, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This real-world cost analysis shows for the first time the encompassing cost of CAR-T therapy for pediatric ALL patients in the US with commercial insurance. This study provides a valuable benchmark that can be used to analyze the financial implications of CAR-T therapy for pediatric ALL therapy on health systems.

Lane Miller

and 5 more

Background: Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment requires numerous lumbar punctures (LPs) with intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy to prevent and treat central nervous system disease. Historically, LPs in this setting are performed using propofol sedation. At our institution, LPs are often alternatively performed under nitrous oxide (N2O). To date, there have been no large scale assessments comparing these sedation methods for this purpose. Procedures: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-31 years with ALL treated between 1/1/2013-12/31/2018 at the Children’s Minnesota Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, including all therapeutic LPs performed in the clinic setting under either propofol or N2O. Results: Among 215 patients and 2677 therapeutic LPs, 56.6% (n = 1515) occurred under N2O with 43.3% (n = 93) of patients using exclusively N2O with all LPs. The incidence of traumatic LPs (RBC ≥ 10 cells/µL) were similar between both treatments (27.3% vs 30.2). Successful IT chemotherapy delivery (99.7% N2O vs 99.8% propofol) did not differ between sedation types. Experiencing a traumatic LP under N2O was associated with a sedation switch for the subsequent LP (aOR 2.40, p=0.002) while older age (aOR 1.08, p<0.0001) and higher BMI percentile (aOR 1.01, p=0.009) were associated with increased likelihood for undergoing a traumatic LP. Conclusion: N2O is an effective sedation option for therapeutic LPs in children with ALL with noninferiority to propofol in terms of IT chemotherapy administration and traumatic LP incidence. For many patients, N2O can effectively replace propofol during LP procedures, which has important safety and quality-of-life implications.