loading page

The Association of Dietary Acid-Base Load with Psychological Disorders, Sleep, and Circadian Rhythm among Obese and Overweight Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
  • +3
  • Atieh Mirzababaei,
  • sanaz mehranfar,
  • Farideh shiraseb,
  • Faezeh Abaj,
  • Cain Clark,
  • khadijeh mirzaei
Atieh Mirzababaei
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Author Profile
sanaz mehranfar
Author Profile
Farideh shiraseb
Author Profile
Faezeh Abaj
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Author Profile
Cain Clark
Coventry University
Author Profile
khadijeh mirzaei
Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Abstract Background: Epidemiologic studies have reported that dietary acid load is associated with psychological disorders through different pathways. We aimed to examine the association of dietary acid-base load with Psychological Disorders, Sleep and circadian rhythm. Methods: This study was performed on 404 female subjects ≥18 years old. We evaluated potential renal acid load (PRAL), net endogenous acid production (NEAP) score by a valid food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for Iran of with 147 items. To assess psychological disorders, an Iranian validated version of depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21) was used. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and morning-evening questionnaire (MEQ) were applied to evaluate sleep quality and circadian rhythm status respectively. Results: Considering a wide range of confounding variables, compared with the low adherence, a significant positive association was observed between dietary acid-base load and severe depression (OR PRAL =1.10, 95%CI=1.01-1.19, P=0.02) and (OR NEAP =2.46, 95%CI=1.41-14.61, P=0.02). Women in the high dietary acid base load category had higher anxiety (ORPRAL=1.12,95%CI=1.02-1.23, P=0.01) and (ORNEAP=1.80,95%CI=1.12-10.72, P=0.01). There was a strong positive relationship between dietary acid-base load and sleep disturbance (P<0.05). Additionally, circadian rhythm assessment showed that those with greater commitment to PRAL had 23% higher risk of being completely E-type, while odds of being completely M-type, was decreased by 15% and 12% across higher adherence to PRAL and NEAP. Conclusion: Women with higher dietary acid-base load score had greater odds for depression, anxiety, psychological distress, sleep disturbance and circadian rhythm compared to lower ones.