INTRODUCTION: Transvenous Lead Extraction (TLE) is usually performed via a superior approach. Predictors and outcomes of TLE requiring femoral vein bailout are poorly defined. We aimed to analyze predictors and consequences of TLE requiring femoral bailout. METHODS: A single tertiary center cohort of 421 consecutive patients who underwent TLE between May 2010 and February 2020 were analyzed. Venography was routinely performed before system upgrade to identify occluded veins. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their need for femoral bailout extraction. RESULTS: A total of 928 leads were extracted with femoral bailout approach was needed in 71 leads(7.7%) among 49 patients(11.6%). A higher proportion of right ventricular(RV) leads required femoral bailout approach compared with right atrial(RA) leads[51/499(10.2%) vs 18/326(5.5%);p=0.02]. Femoral bailout was more common among younger patients, longer lead dwell time, more pocket entries, higher number of extracted leads, presence of abandoned leads and among patients with vascular occlusion. Following multivariate analysis, presence of abandoned leads, vascular occlusion and younger age remained a significant predictor for femoral bailout. Femoral bailout resulted in higher rates of major complications [5/49(10.2%) vs 12/372(3.2%);p=0.05] without intra-procedural mortality and no additional 30-day mortality[2/49(4.1%) vs 33/377(8.8%);p=0.39]. CONCLUSION: TLE of abandoned leads, occluded veins and younger age were found to be predictors of femoral bailout requirement. Despite higher rates of major complications in femoral TLE bailout, mortality was not increased. Venography prior to TLE should be considered for procedure planning.

Background: The COVID‑19 pandemic is an ongoing global pandemic. Jerusalem with its 919,400 inhabitants has a wide variety of populations, of which 62% are Jews (36% ultra-orthodox; 64% non-ultraorthodox) and 38% Arabs which were largely affected by the pandemic. The aim of our study was to understand the different presentations, course and clinical outcomes in these different ethnical and cultural groups in Jerusalem in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We performed a cohort study of all COVID-19 patients admitted between March 9 - July 16, 2020 to the two university medical centers in Jerusalem. Patients were divided according to their religion and ethnicity into 3 main groups: 1) Ultra-Orthodox Jews; 2) other (non-Ultra-Orthodox) Jews and 3) Arabs. Results: Six hundred and two patients comprised the study population. Of them the 361 (60%) were Ultra-Orthodox Jews; 166 (27.5%) non-Ultra-Orthodox Jews and 75 (12.5%) Arabs. The Arab patients were younger than the Ultra-Orthodox Jews and the non-Ultra-Orthodox Jews (51±18 year-old vs. 57±21 and 59±19, respectively, p<0.01), but suffered from significantly more co-morbidities. Moreover, hemodynamic shock, ischemic ECG changes and pathological chest x-ray were all more frequent in the Ultra-Orthodox patients as compared the other groups of patients. Being an Ultra-Orthodox was independently associated with significantly higher rate of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) [OR=1.96; 95% CI (1.03-3.71), p<0.05]. Age was the only independent risk factor associated with increased mortality rate [OR=1.10; 95% CI (1.07 - 1.13), p<0.001]. Conclusions: The COVID-19 first phase in Jerusalem, affected different ethnical and cultural groups differently, with the Ultra-Orthodox Jews mostly affected by admission rates, presenting symptoms clinical course and MACE (Acute coronary syndrome, shock, cerebrovascular event or venous thromboembolism). It is conceivable that vulnerable populations need special attention and health planning in time of pandemic, to prevent rapid distribution and severe morbidity.

Aim: To evaluate prevalence of heart failure (HF) medical treatment and its impact on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and survival among patients implanted with primary prevention ICD/CRTD. Methods and results: The association of treatment and dose (% guideline recommended target) of beta-blockers (BB), Angiotensin-antagonists (AngA), Mineralocorticoid-antagonsits (MRA), and Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs (AAD) after ICD/CRTD implant with VA episodes and mortality was analyzed. We included 186 patients, meanSD age 66.412 years, 15.1% female, 79(42.5%) implanted with an ICD and 107(57.5%) with CRTD. During 3.8 [2.1;6.7] (median[IQR]) years; 52(28%) had VA and 77(41.4%) died. Treatment (medication, % of patients) included: BB (83%), AngA (87%), MRA (59%), and AAD (43.5%). Median doses were 25[12.5;50]% of target for BB or AngA and 25[0;50]% of target for MRA. Treatment with >25% target dose of BB was associated with reduced incident VA. In a multivariable model including age, gender, diabetes, heart rate, and medication doses, increased BB dose was significantly and independently associated with reduced VA (HR 0.443 95%CI 0.222-0.885; p=0.021). On multivariable model for overall mortality including age, gender, renal disease, VA, and medical treatment; VA was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.672; 95% CI 1.429-4.999; p=0.002) and AngA treatment was significantly and independently associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.515; 95% CI 0.285-0.929; p=0.028). Conclusions: In this cohort of real-life HF patients discharged after ICD/CRTD implant, most of the patients were prescribed with guideline-based HF medications albeit with low doses. Higher BB dose was associated with reduced VA, while treatment with AngA was associated with improved survival.

Objectives: A significant proportion of COVID-19 patients may have cardiac involvement including arrhythmias. Although arrhythmia characterization and possible predictors were previously reported, there are conflicting data regarding the exact prevalence of arrhythmias. Clinically applicable algorithms to classify COVID patients’ arrhythmic risk are still lacking, and are the aim of our study. Methods: We describe a single center cohort of hospitalized patients with a positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 during the initial Israeli outbreak between 1/2/2020 –30/5/2020. The study’s outcome was any documented arrhythmia during hospitalization, based on daily physical examination, routine ECG’s, periodic 24-hour Holter, and continuous monitoring. Multivariate analysis was used to find predictors for new arrhythmias and create classification trees for discriminating patients with high and low arrhythmic risk. Results: Out of 390 COVID-19 patients included, 28 (7.2%) had documented arrhythmias during hospitalization, including: 23 atrial tachyarrhythmias, combined atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia storm, and 3 bradyarrhythmias. Only 7/28 patients had previous arrhythmias. Our study showed significant correlation between disease severity and arrhythmia prevalence (p<0.001) with a low arrhythmic prevalence among mild disease patients (2%). Multivariate analysis revealed background heart failure (CHF) and disease severity are independently associated with overall arrhythmia while age, CHF, disease severity, and arrhythmic symptoms are associated with tachyarrhythmias. A novel decision tree using age, disease severity, CHF, and troponin levels was created to stratify patients into high and low risk for developing arrhythmia. Conclusions: Dominant arrhythmia among COVID-19 patients is AF. Arrhythmia prevalence is dependent on age, disease severity, CHF, and troponin levels. A novel simple Classification tree, based on these parameters, can discriminate between high and low arrhythmic risk patients.