Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Neutral and adaptive differentiation in pike (Esox lucius) populations from contrasting environments
  • +5
  • Johanna Sunde,
  • Yeşerin Yıldırım,
  • Petter Tibblin,
  • Dorte Bekkevold,
  • Christian Skov,
  • Oscar Nordahl,
  • Per Larsson,
  • Anders Forsman
Johanna Sunde
Linnaeus University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Yeşerin Yıldırım
Linnaeus University
Author Profile
Petter Tibblin
Linnaeus University
Author Profile
Dorte Bekkevold
Technical University of Denmark National Institute of Aquatic Resources Silkeborg
Author Profile
Christian Skov
Technical University of Denmark National Institute of Aquatic Resources Silkeborg
Author Profile
Oscar Nordahl
Linnaeus University
Author Profile
Per Larsson
Linnaeus University
Author Profile
Anders Forsman
Linnaeus University
Author Profile

Abstract

Understanding how eco-evolutionary processes and environmental factors drive population differentiation and adaptation are key challenges in evolutionary biology and of relevance for biodiversity protection. Differentiation requires at least partial reproductive separation, which may result from geographic isolation (allopatry), isolation by distance (IBD), environment (IBE), adaptation (IBA), and time (IBT). We investigate how ecological and evolutionary processes influence genetic diversity and structure in 11 populations of pike (Esox lucius) using Restriction-site Associated DNA sequencing (RADseq). Study populations represented three ecotypes (freshwater, anadromous, and brackish water resident) along a latitudinal gradient (54.9 - 63.6 °N). Genetic diversity and structure were investigated both for the full RADseq dataset (5993 loci) and for an adaptive subset consisting outlier loci. Both neutral and adaptive processes influenced genetic structure, and their contributions differed between allopatric and sympatric populations, and also within and among ecotypes. Signatures of neutral processes were pronounced among geographically isolated freshwater populations, likely reflecting long time since divergence combined with low gene flow. For sympatric populations, ecotype (anadromous versus resident) and geography influenced both neutral and adaptive genetic structure, consistent with IBE. Outlier analyses pointed to a role of selection associated with salinity and temperature, consistent with IBA. Results provide rare evidence that separate analyses of neutral and adaptive loci can help illuminate how different, potentially interacting, processes jointly contribute to shaping spatiotemporal patterns of biodiversity. It is argued that data on adaptive rather than neutral genetic variation should inform management and policy development.