Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Patient’s experience with Arabin cervical pessary during pregnancy: a questionnaire survey
  • +4
  • Viola Seravalli,
  • Noemi Strambi,
  • Alessandra D’Arienzo,
  • Francesco Magni,
  • Ludovico Bernardi,
  • Anna Morucchio,
  • Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
Viola Seravalli
University of Florence

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Noemi Strambi
University of Florence
Author Profile
Alessandra D’Arienzo
University of Florence
Author Profile
Francesco Magni
University of Florence
Author Profile
Ludovico Bernardi
University of Florence
Author Profile
Anna Morucchio
University of Florence
Author Profile
Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
University of Florence
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective To investigate women’s experience with the cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birth. Design: Retrospecitve questionnaire study. Setting: Tertiary care hospital in Italy. Population: 166 pregnant women treated with Arabin cervical pessary within one center. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to all women after delivery. Main outcome measures: Data about patient’s experience before the insertion (adequacy of the information received), during treatment (follow-up, impact on daily life, perceived discomfort, side effects) and at the time of removal (pain, patient’s expectation met regarding the treatment) were analysed. Results: Information received before the insertion of Arabin pessary was considered adequate in 163/166 (98.2%). An increase of vaginal discharge was experienced by 70/166 (42.2%) women. Discomfort or other side effects were reported in 13.8% and 16.3% of cases, respectively. Overall, 77% of women reported an improved quality of life and 94% considered the follow-up during pregnancy adequate. Removal was moderately painful for 58/166 (35%) of women. Patient’s expectations regarding the treatment were exceeded in the majority of cases (75.3%). In a final step, we compared our results to previous studies suggesting that clinical experience of the health care specialists in charge may explain why the discrepancy of results. Conclusion: Although some trials report high rates of non-compliant patients, this could not be confirmed by our study. In contrast, most women reported a positive experience and were motivated to continue the treatment when they were continuously followed by experienced clinicians.