Spirometry versus Forced Oscillation to Assess Lung Function Outcome at
5-years of Age.
Abstract
Background: Spirometry is the gold standard for assessing airway
function for clinical studies; however, obtaining high quality data in
young children remains challenging. Since the forced oscillation
technique (FOT) requires less subject cooperations, there has been
increasing interest in FOT, particularly in young children. We evaluated
whether spirometry and FOT in young children provides comparable ability
to detect a treatment effect. Methods: We recently reported in a
randomized controlled trial that vitamin C compared to placebo treatment
of mothers who smoked during pregnancy (MSDP) results in the offspring
having significantly higher forced expiratory flows at 5-years of age,
as well as significantly less wheeze at 4-6 years of age. In these same
offspring, we also measured FOT at 8-Hz impedance at 3, 4, and 5 years
of age. Results: Although spirometry demonstrated significantly
increased forced expiratory flows (FEFs) in the vitamin C compared to
placebo treatment group at 5-years of age (p < 0.001), we were
not able to detect a similar treatment effect using FOT impedance.
Conclusions: It may be challenging to obtain technically successful
spirometry in pre-school children; however, forced expiratory flows may
provide a better outcome than single frequency FOT impedance to assess
improvements in airway function in these young subjects.