Eda Tokat

and 22 more

Purpose: We designed a multicenter, retrospective study to investigate the current trends in initial management of reflux with respect to EAU guidelines in Urology clinics of our country. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 1988 renal units (RU) of 1345 patients treated surgically due to VUR between years 2003-2017 in 9 different institutions. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to time of initial treatment and also grouped according to risk factors by “EAU guidelines on VUR”. Results: 1426 RUs were treated initially conservatively and 562 RUs were initially treated with surgery. In initially surgically treated group, success rates of surgery decreased significantly in low and moderate risk groups after 2013 (p=0.046, p=0.0001, respectively), while success rates were not significantly different in high risk group (p=0.46). While 26.6% of patients in low risk group were initially surgically treated before 2013, this rate has increased to 34.6% after 2013, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.096). However, performing surgery as the initial treatment approach increased significantly in both moderate and high risk groups (p=0.000 and p=0.0001, respectively) after 2013. Overall success rates of endoscopic and UNC operations were 65% and 92.9% before 2013, 60% and 78.5% after 2013, respectively. Thus the overall success rate for surgery was 72.6%. There was significant difference between success rates of UNC operations before and after 2013(p=0.000), while the difference was not significant in the STING group (p=0.076). Conclusion: Current trends in management of reflux in our country do not yet follow the EAU guidelines on VUR in low and moderate risk groups.

TANER CEYLAN

and 6 more

Aim: We aimed to compare pre-voiding bladder and post-voiding residual (BV, PVR) volumes measured by portable ultrasonic scanner (PUS) in standing and supine positions. Material and Methods: A total of 436 children were included. We composed 2 groups (group-1: PUS vs. volume by catheter, group-2: PUS vs. infused volume during urodynamic study) to evaluate the agreement of PUS measurements with actual bladder volume and then third group (group-3) to analyze the correlation of PUS measurements in standing vs. supine positions. In groups 1 and 2, agreement of measurements were evaluated by paired sample T or Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Following confirmation of agreement, correlations were analyzed by Pearson’s or Spearman’s coefficients in all groups. Interpretation of coefficients were done as 0.90-1.00 (very high correlation) and 0.70-0.90 (high correlation), respectively. Results: In group-1, measurements (catheter vs. PUS) were similar (Wilcoxon Signed rank test, p= 0.976) and were highly correlated (r=0.873). In group-2, measurements of bladder volumes infused by urodynamic device and volumes by PUS were similar that revealed the agreement of PUS measurements on different volumes and highly correlated at the 25th and very highly correlated at the 50th, 75th and 100th percentiles of the EBC (estimated bladder capacity related to age). In group-3, BV and PVR measurements by PUS in standing and supine positions were highly correlated that revelaed PUS can be used in both positions. Conclusion: Measurements of BV before uroflowmetry or PVR volume by PUS in standing position gave similar results with those in supine position.