Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Core outcome sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
  • +4
  • Marie Österberg,
  • Christel Hellberg,
  • AnnKristine Jonsson,
  • Sara Fundell,
  • Frida Trönnberg,
  • Alkistis Skalkidou,
  • Maria Jonsson
Marie Österberg

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Christel Hellberg
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden
Author Profile
AnnKristine Jonsson
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden
Author Profile
Sara Fundell
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden
Author Profile
Frida Trönnberg
Author Profile
Alkistis Skalkidou
Author Profile
Maria Jonsson
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Uppsala, SE
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews of clinical trials frequently reveal heterogeneity in the number and types of outcomes reported. To counteract this, a Core Outcome Set (COS) may be applied. Objectives: A systematic review of all completed and ongoing COS related to pregnancy and childbirth Search strategy: COMET up to January 2020, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Academic Search Elite, CINAHL and SocINDEX up to June 2019. Selection criteria: Studies which prioritized outcomes using some form of consensus method (such as the Delphi technique) were included. Data collection and analysis: All included studies were checked for compliance with the Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting. Information about population, setting, method and outcomes was extracted. Main results: Nineteen completed studies and thirty-nine ongoing studies were included. The number of outcomes included in various COS ranged from 6 to 48. Most COS were for conditions related to physical complications during pregnancy. No COS were identified for perinatal mental health. Conclusion: This review discloses a growing number of COS within the field of pregnancy and childbirth. Many of the completed studies follow the proposed reporting. However, several of the COS included a large number of outcomes. There is a need to consider the number of outcomes which may be included in a COS while retaining its applicability in future research. Funding This article is adapted from a report undertaken by the SBU, who provided funding for the study. Keywords: Childbirth, Core outcome set, Maternal health, Obstetric care, Pregnancy