Two sides of the same coin? How quality improvement can be used to
augment program evaluation in health professions education to promote
social accountability
- Allison Brown,
- Lawrence Grierson
Lawrence Grierson
McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences
Author ProfileAbstract
Health professions education is in constant pursuit of new ways of
teaching and assessment in order to improve the training of healthcare
professionals. Educators are often challenged with designing,
implementing, and evaluating programs in the context of their
professional practice, particularly those in response to dynamic and
emerging social needs. This article explores the synergies and
intersections of two approaches -- quality improvement and program
evaluation -- and the potential utility of their combinations within our
field to design, evaluate, and most importantly, improve educational
programming. We argue that the inclusion of established quality
improvement frameworks within program evaluation provides a proven
mechanism for driving change, can optimize programming within the
multi-contextual education systems, and, ultimately, that these two
approaches are complementary to one another. These combinations hold
great promise for optimizing programming in alignment with social
missions, where it has been difficult for institutions worldwide to
generate and capture evidence of social accountability.01 Apr 2021Submitted to Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 07 Apr 2021Submission Checks Completed
07 Apr 2021Assigned to Editor
09 Apr 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
20 May 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
20 May 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Major
29 Jun 20211st Revision Received
30 Jun 2021Submission Checks Completed
30 Jun 2021Assigned to Editor
30 Jun 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
30 Jun 2021Editorial Decision: Accept