loading page

Remotely-sensed vegetation greening along a restoration gradient of a tropical forest, Kibale National Park, Uganda
  • +2
  • Anu Valtonen,
  • Eveliina Korkiatupa,
  • Sille Holm,
  • Geoffrey Malinga,
  • Ryosuke Nakadai
Anu Valtonen
University of Eastern Finland

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Eveliina Korkiatupa
University of Eastern Finland
Author Profile
Sille Holm
University of Eastern Finland
Author Profile
Geoffrey Malinga
University of Eastern Finland
Author Profile
Ryosuke Nakadai
The University of Tokyo
Author Profile

Abstract

Restoration has now emerged as a global priority, with international initiatives such as the “UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030)”. To fulfil the large-scale global restoration ambitions, an essential step is the monitoring of vegetation recovery after restoration interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of remotely-sensed vegetation indices, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), to monitor the rate of forest regeneration across a tropical forest restoration project area in Kibale National Park, Uganda. As a result, we observed non-linear patterns in NDVI and EVI across the first 25 years of recovery. Both NDVI and EVI increase for the first 10 years of forest regeneration. This “greening” phase could be used as the indicator of successful onset of forest recovery. In particular, the decline of elephant grass, which suppresses the natural regeneration of trees in our area, can be detected as an increase in NDVI. Primary forests differed from the 25-year-old regenerating forests based on the unique combination of low mean and low seasonal variation in EVI. Our results, therefore, suggest that the long-term success of forest restoration could be monitored by evaluating how closely the combination of mean, and degree of seasonal variation in EVI, resembles that observed in the primary forest.
31 Mar 2021Submitted to Land Degradation & Development
01 Apr 2021Submission Checks Completed
01 Apr 2021Assigned to Editor
09 Apr 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
05 Jul 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Jul 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Major
08 Aug 20211st Revision Received
09 Aug 2021Submission Checks Completed
09 Aug 2021Assigned to Editor
30 Aug 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Sep 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
27 Sep 2021Published in Land Degradation & Development. 10.1002/ldr.4096