Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on time to diagnosis of childhood cancer
  • +6
  • Fanny Delehaye,
  • Chloé GONCALVES,
  • Jérémie Rouger,
  • isabelle pellier,
  • Jean-Jacques Parienti,
  • Julien Lejeune,
  • Audrey Grain,
  • julien Rod,
  • Virginie GANDEMER
Fanny Delehaye
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Chloé GONCALVES
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen
Author Profile
Jérémie Rouger
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen
Author Profile
isabelle pellier
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers
Author Profile
Jean-Jacques Parienti
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen
Author Profile
Julien Lejeune
Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours
Author Profile
Audrey Grain
Nantes Universite
Author Profile
julien Rod
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen
Author Profile
Virginie GANDEMER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: In adults, there is a link between socioeconomic status (SES) and cancer prognosis, notably due to increased time to diagnosis (TTD) in deprived population leading to the spread of the disease. In children, such an association has not been clearly reported. The objective of our study was to assess the impact of SES on TTD of childhood cancer and its potential consequences on cancer prognosis. Methods: We carried out a multicenter retrospective study based on the LOGAFTER multicentric database. We studied the SES at the individual and ecological levels. Results: Overall, 854 children were included. The median time to diagnosis was 28 days [12;64]. A usual care pathway did not seem to impact TTD, but the use of alternative medicine and an initial management by professionals not usually involved in the specific childhood cancer context increased TTD. None of the SES ecological variables were strictly associated with a significant impact on TTD. However, we noted strong trends for single-parent families and children whose fathers had died who presented with an increased TTD. Conclusions: In the current study, the impact of SES on TTD in children on both the individual and ecological levels was not clear. However, we noted some keys at the individual scale that require further investigation to explain a potential association between deprivation and TTD.