Gender Analysis of the Top Classic Papers in Otolaryngology Head and
Neck Surgery
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to identify and analyze the gender
breakdown of first authorship contributing to the most cited papers in
the field of otolaryngology, with a goal towards identifying trends in
gender representation in publishing. Methods The top fifty most-cited
papers were identified using Science Citation Index of the Institute for
Scientific Information. Institution, journal, date of publication,
research nature, and subspecialty were extracted for each article. Among
the first authors, gender, h-index, percentage of first, last, and
corresponding authorship positions, total publications, and citations
were analyzed. Results The majority of papers were in the English
language, from the United States, of clinical nature, and on otologic
topics. Eighty-four percent of papers had men who were first authors
although there was no difference in h-index score, authorship position,
and number of publications between men and women first authors. Women
first authors had significantly more citations (p = 0.02) and average
citations/year (p= 0.04) compared to their colleagues. There was no
difference in the number of articles with women first authors (p = 0.17)
or the total percentage of women authors (p = 0.44) in papers published
earlier compared to those published later. Conclusion While a promising
number of women otolaryngologists are publishing high-powered articles,
future initiatives to promote academic productivity and inclusivity
should be considered.