Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

A Generalized Reduced Fluid Dynamic Model for Flow Fields and Electrodes in Redox Flow Batteries
  • +5
  • Ziqiang Cheng,
  • Kevin Tenny,
  • Alberto Pizzolato,
  • Antoni Forner-Cuenca,
  • Vittorio Verda,
  • Yet-Ming Chiang,
  • Fikile Brushett,
  • Reza Behrou
Ziqiang Cheng
Politecnico di Torino

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Kevin Tenny
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Author Profile
Alberto Pizzolato
Politecnico di Torino
Author Profile
Antoni Forner-Cuenca
Eindhoven University of Technology
Author Profile
Vittorio Verda
Politecnico di Torino
Author Profile
Yet-Ming Chiang
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Author Profile
Fikile Brushett
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Author Profile
Reza Behrou
University of California San Diego
Author Profile

Abstract

High dimensional models typically require a large computational overhead for multiphysics applications, which hamper their use for broad-sweeping domain interrogation. Herein, we develop a modeling framework to capture the through-plane fluid dynamic response of electrodes and flow fields in a redox flow cell, generating a computationally inexpensive two-dimensional (2D) model. We leverage a depth averaging approach that also accounts for variations in out-of-plane fluid motion and departures from Darcy’s law that arise from averaging across three-dimensions (3D). Our Resulting depth-averaged 2D model successfully predict the fluid dynamic response of arbitrary in-plane flow field geometries, with discrepancies of < 5% for both maximum velocity and pressure drop. This corresponds to reduced computational expense, as compared to 3D representations (< 1% of duration and 10% of RAM usage), providing a platform to screen and optimize a diverse set of cell geometries.
28 Jul 2021Submitted to AIChE Journal
01 Aug 2021Submission Checks Completed
01 Aug 2021Assigned to Editor
07 Aug 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
11 Sep 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
10 Oct 20211st Revision Received
12 Oct 2021Submission Checks Completed
12 Oct 2021Assigned to Editor
18 Oct 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
04 Nov 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
07 Nov 20212nd Revision Received
08 Nov 2021Submission Checks Completed
08 Nov 2021Assigned to Editor
14 Nov 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
01 Dec 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
Apr 2022Published in AIChE Journal volume 68 issue 4. 10.1002/aic.17540